{"id":73,"date":"2018-02-04T02:37:20","date_gmt":"2018-02-04T02:37:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/?p=73"},"modified":"2018-02-04T02:37:20","modified_gmt":"2018-02-04T02:37:20","slug":"ldrs591-unit-6-activity-6-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/2018\/02\/04\/ldrs591-unit-6-activity-6-1\/","title":{"rendered":"LDRS591, Unit 6, Activity 6.1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>l will evaluate E. Russell, Maxfield, and J. Russell&#8217;s (2017) study based on Plano-Clark &amp; Creswell&#8217;s (2015) seven criteria for evaluating the research design of a qualitative research report (p.\u00a0 301).<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>A research design guides the conduct of the qualitative study (3\/3) &#8211;\u00a0 <\/strong>Russell et al. (2017) use the qualitative grounded theory &#8220;to discover how senior level leaders perceive personal benefits derived from serving the needs of their followers&#8221; (p. 75); this study researched the action of perceiving personal benefits through online questionnaires that questioned 14 senior level leaders. As the grounded theory approach seeks to explain &#8220;a process, action, or interaction [&#8230;.] built from the experiences and perspectives of participants,&#8221; Russell et al. (2017) seems knowledgeable about the design and use accurate terms to describe the grounded theory process.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The choice of the research design is appropriate\u00a0 and justified (3\/3) &#8211;\u00a0<\/strong>Russell et al. (2017) justify their choice of using the qualitative grounded theory by stating: &#8220;The design allows for an analysis of data using a constant <a href=\"http:\/\/polisci.berkeley.edu\/sites\/default\/files\/people\/u3827\/APSA-TheComparativeMethod.pdf\">comparative method<\/a>&#8221; (p. 84). Beyond this reasoning, the nature of the study that considers the experience of its participants&#8217; interpretation of their personal benefits derived from serving followers requires personal assessments of leaders &#8220;who have experienced the process&#8221; (Plano-Clark &amp; Creswell, 2015, p. 298) that the grounded theory offers.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Good qualitative data collection procedures are used (2\/3) &#8211;\u00a0<\/strong>Plano-Clark &amp; Creswell (2015) state, &#8220;You often find that the grounded theory researcher interviewed people&#8221; (p. 298). While Russell et al. (2017) do not interview their participants directly, they choose to collect their participants&#8217; experience and perspectives through online questionnaires to protect their anonymity which equally serves the study&#8217;s purpose. The researchers ran a pilot study to refine the questions, and &#8220;established a secure database for data collection and storage to ensure data reliability&#8221; (p. 85).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Good qualitative analysis procedures are used (3\/3) &#8211;\u00a0<\/strong>A good grounded research analyses &#8220;data using multiple stages of coding&#8221; (Plano-Clark &amp; Creswell, 2015, p. 298). Russell et al. (2017) adhere to this characteristic by using &#8220;a tiered process for the sorting and analysis of the data&#8221; (p. 86) which included open codes and axial codes.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Good qualitative results and interpretations are reported (3\/3) &#8211;\u00a0<\/strong>The results are organized well into two categories (or attributes) and a sample of the questionnaire answers are presented to support the two attributes. Overall, the conclusion and discussion of the data interpret the generated theory that leaders benefits from serving followers.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The study used a rigorous research design (3\/3) &#8211;\u00a0<\/strong>The study&#8217;s process and analysis fit together logically and coherently. The article begins with a clear framework of the characteristics of servant leadership, and explore its research question thoroughly.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The use of the qualitative research design addressed the study&#8217;s purpose (3\/3) &#8211;\u00a0<\/strong>The research design fits the study&#8217;s intent and answers the study&#8217;s intent of understanding how senior leadership perceives personal benefits of serving their followers; &#8220;leaders realize personal benefits from serving the needs of followers&#8221; (Russel et al., 2015, p. 92).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>References<\/p>\n<p>Plano-Clark, V., &amp; Creswell, J. (2015).\u00a0<em>Understanding research: A consumer\u2019s guide<\/em>\u00a0(2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.<\/p>\n<div id=\"body\" class=\"clearfix\">\n<div id=\"layout\" class=\"pagewidth clearfix\">\n<div id=\"content\" class=\"clearfix\">\n<div id=\"page-1342\" class=\"type-page\">\n<div class=\"page-content entry-content\">\n<p>Russell, E. J., Maxfield, R. J., &amp; Russell, J. L. (2017). Discovering the self-interest of servant leadership: A grounded theory.\u00a0<em>Servant Leadership: Theory and Practice, 4<\/em>(1), 75-97. Retrieved from\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sltpjournal.org\/uploads\/2\/6\/3\/9\/26394582\/06russell_vol_4_issue_1.pdf\">http:\/\/www.sltpjournal.org\/uploads\/2\/6\/3\/9\/26394582\/06russell_vol_4_issue_1.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>l will evaluate E. Russell, Maxfield, and J. Russell&#8217;s (2017) study based on Plano-Clark &amp; Creswell&#8217;s (2015) seven criteria for evaluating the research design of a qualitative research report (p.\u00a0 301). A research design guides the conduct of the qualitative study (3\/3) &#8211;\u00a0 Russell et al. (2017) use the qualitative grounded theory &#8220;to discover how &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/2018\/02\/04\/ldrs591-unit-6-activity-6-1\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;LDRS591, Unit 6, Activity 6.1&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":225,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,29,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ldrs591","category-learning-activity-6-1","category-unit-6"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/225"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":74,"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73\/revisions\/74"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/create.twu.ca\/soleona\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}