Unit 6, Learning Activity 3

Living in the Informational Age, people have invested too much energy in building the relationship with technology and relied on it. Technology has become part of our life, and basically, all kinds of organization exert the role of technology to gather information and to break through. For example, in my company, the Information Department has designed an organizational website for the staff to review the news of the organization and to post their professional report. We also have our own chat tools requested to use within the organization. Although most of the companies have incorporated high-tech means, technology itself is not the most crucial factor to offer “competitive advantage” (Kandampully, Bilgihan, & Tingting, 2016, p. 159). How to use it effectively in the right way is the main task for the organizations. In another word, “technology is created and changed by human actions, it is also used by people to accomplish various actions” (Kandampully, Bilgihan, & Tingting, 2016, p. 159). Therefore, the organization should address more on how to motivate the staff to use technology creatively. 

Inspired by the People-technology hybrid organizational model (Kandampully, Bilgihan, & Tingting, 2016), I have outlined a 4-step plan for employee development in my organization.

1. Design new communication tool for group chat

Although we have chat tools installed on everyone’s computer, we just use it to transfer files or documents most of the time. We used to text each other or send voice messages via other communication means such as Wechat. While actually, it is inappropriate for us to talk about issues of work through other communication means, and the chat record cannot be presented as evidence when encountering issues such as the conflict between different divisions. Therefore, creating an effective communication tool within the organization which could enable staff to use group chat whenever they want is the top-priority thing to do. The staff could genuinely exchange their opinions or thoughts through the group chat with each other, and they can create many chat groups to facilitate the communication with different people. For example, an employee can join a chat group of his/her division, or he/she could join another chat group which is consist of other people from different divisions who are in charge of the similar tasks as him/her.

2. Create a platform for offering and filtering feedbacks of innovative ideas

After creating the useful communication means for exchanging opinions, a platform which could allow staff to upload the electronic materials of their innovative products should be established. Also, the platform should allow other people to offer useful and valuable feedbacks rated by other readers. The innovators could refine their innovative products based on the feedbacks which are considered useful. I believe this would be the right way for genuine creation because the products are made based on the need of the workers rather than the need of the managers.

3. Offering external support

Sometimes, the chatting software or platform cannot be designed and accomplished by the staff in the organization. The higher management should offer great help such as technicists from a software company to make it happen. Although the technicists might not be familiar with the needs of the staff, they could have meetings and discussions until the satisfactory plan comes out. 

The external support could also involve hiring a professional assessment company to design a series of suitable questionnaires for the company. The questionnaires can help the staff to rate their level of professional work, to develop their personalities perceived by other colleagues, and to acquire all kinds of perspective including customers.

4. Seeking online courses to help managers understand and exert the power of leardership

Managers are definitely adult learners. Offering the suitable training courses to help them get access to the knowledge of leadership is the perfect way to motivate them to learn internally (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 1972). When managers possess the knowledge of leadership, they could understand how to better motivate the staff towards the common goal. Further, they could solve the problems and make decisions effectively with the ability of critical thinking. The most important thing is that once the managers have become transformative leaders or servant leaders, they could devote more to the community and society (Northouse, 2016).

References

Kandampully, J., Bilgihan, A., & Zhang, T. C. (2016). Developing a people-technology hybrids model to unleash innovation and creativity: The new hospitality frontier. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 29, 154-164.

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (1972). Andragogy. NETCHE.

Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.

https://create.twu.ca/ldrs500/unit-6/unit-6-learning-activities/

 

Unit 6, Learning Activity 1

My experience working with adult learners

Fortunately, my professional work has a lot to do with adult learners as I am one of the trainers in my organization to train new recruits who are at least older than 22. Adult learners are defined in two ways: in one sense, adults refer to “mentally mature people”; in a different sense, adults can be understood as “individuals who are beyond the traditional school ages of 7 to 21” (Lieb & Goodlad, 2005, p. 7). Clearly, the new employees can be treated as adult learners. Before I got access to the term “Andragogy”, I had never systematically considered about the difference between adult learners and children or teenagers. However, I did find out that the employees trained in my course represented several traits which were completely different with my memory of being a student during the period of high school or college. I had summarized these traits that the employees (adult learners) were very aware of what was imported to them; they also valued their experience and thoughts very much and loved to share the experience with other people; when they were not interested in the content or knowledge points I was illustrating, they just left the room to run their personal errands; and it was hard for them to accept something beyond their recognition and beliefs. These special features sometimes greatly facilitated the quality of training and the trainees showed high degree of original learning, such as the principles or knowledge just accorded with their values and experience. While, sometimes the traits were the obstacles against adult learners’ participation in learning. My previous summarization did help me to reinforce my understanding the six principles of andragogy (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 1972).

1. “Self-concept: As a person matures, his or her self-concept moves from that of a dependent personality toward one of a self-directing human being” (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 1972, p. 4).

Self-concept includes self-schema, which is our “beliefs about self that organize and guide the processing of self-relevant information”, and possible selves which are “images of what we dream of or dread becoming in the future” (Myers & Smith, 2012, p. 39). Basically, self-concept is our sense of self that based on our personal experience and keeping moving towards our ideal self. Since each individual has his or her own possible selves, their destinations and directions are completely distinctive. I can always distinguish the trainees’ directions because they would focus more on the knowledge which can help them build on the way towards their possible selves and act indifferent to the skills which is irrelevant to the directions. Also, they are more firm on their way to achieve the ideal selves than the teenagers who are mostly confused and unsure about the future.

2. “Experience: As a person matures, he or she accumulates a growing reservoir of experience that becomes an increasing resource for learning” (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 1972, p. 4).

Experience is related to self-concept because the self-schemas of self-concept can “help us organize and retrieve our experiences” (Myers & Smith, 2012, p. 39). Experience is also the most typical principle that makes adult learning distinctive from learning in childhood (Mezirow, 1993). Generally, the older you are, the more experience you will gain in terms of many aspects of life and professional work. Based on my experience with adult learners, the Experience can be both an accelerator and a barrier for them. We do not just train new staff, we also regularly give class to older workers to see if they still retain the skills and knowledge. Apparently, the older staff have possessed several years working experience. It is extremely easy to re-teach them, and they are always willing to share their experience with the new staff. But when we are trying to show them a new way or method which can help them work effectively, the acceptance degree of the older staff is much lower than the new employees as the older staff are habitual of resorting to the old ways to solve problems. They would rely on their own experience, which they value a lot and has become part of their beliefs (Mezirow, 1993), and it is hard to transform them to another perspective.

3. “Readiness to learn: As a person matures his/her readiness to learn becomes oriented increasingly to the developmental tasks of his social roles” (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 1972, p. 4).

“Adults are practical, focusing on the aspects of a lesson most useful to them in their work” (Lieb & Goodlad, 2005, p. 2). I think the developmental tasks of one’s social roles can be seen as the tasks they would like to accomplish to become their possible selves. Focusing on the practical aspects can help the adult learners move towards the goal accurately and steadily.

4. “Orientation to learning: There is a change in time perspective as people mature – from future application of knowledge to immediacy of application. Thus, an adult is more problem than subject centered in learning” (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 1972, p. 4).

Adults are “goal-oriented” and “relevancy-oriented” (Lieb & Goodlad, 2005, p. 2). I think the goal means solving real life or work problems as soon as possible. Based on my experience, I think the reason why adult learners are reluctant to accept irrelevant knowledge they might use in the future is that adults have so much to deal with both in life and work and they do not have enough capacity to memorize a vast amount of knowledge. They just want to gain the relevant skills that can fix the problem they are facing as soon as possible.

5. “Motivation to learn: As a person matures the motivation to learn is internal” (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 1972, p. 4).

The motivation factors for adult learners are listed by Lieb and Goodlad (2005) that “typical motivations include a requirement for competence or licensing, an expected promotion, a need to maintain old skills or learn new ones, a need to adapt to job changes, and the need to learn in order to comply with company directives” (p. 3). Clearly, the needs and requirements mentioned above are internal factors which represent the adults’ own willingness. The trainees I have met are more motivated by the need to adapt to job changes and to comply with company directives, and they want to be competent in the work and become someone reliable and trustworthy.

6. “The need to know: Adults need to know why they need to learn something before undertaking to learn it” (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 1972, p. 4).

As an adult learner, I clearly realized that teacher or trainer is a typical type of servant leadership before I took the course. And I hope what I am learning right now and what I will learn from the future courses will greatly help me create value for the organization and the community. I would also want to help other people understand the power of embodying servant leadership in educational and training profession.

References

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (1972). Andragogy. NETCHE.

Lieb, S., & Goodlad, J. (2005). Principles of adult learning. Retrieve from http://carrie-e.startlogic.com/handouts/Rotterdam2012/Eu_Coaches_Conf2_Rott_Day_1_A4.pdf

Mezirow, J. (1993). A transformation theory of adult learning. In Adult Education Research Annual Conference Proceedings. pp. 141-146.

Myers, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (2012). Exploring social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

https://create.twu.ca/ldrs500/unit-6/unit-6-learning-activities/

Unit6, Learning Activity 2

A Facetime Audio Interview with Linda Elson

Linda is a sales manager of a pharmaceutical company. Sometimes, there will be more than two providers, and she can always deal with them very well. She is very confident in staying calm and communicating with people, including her team, the providers, and the patients. Further, She cares not only for the patients and her team members but also the providers. When the drugs are promoted to the market, she can always get support from people, and her sales performance and customer satisfaction level are high. She loves her job very much and has decided to be with the company and her team in the future. She would like to make the best of the team in this company and to become a better herself as well. In order to devote more to her professional work, she would continue with this master to develop her potential ability as much as she can. And, more important, the leadership role she is taking can be an emergent leader sometimes, the ability required in the decision-making process is crucial for her, as well as critical thinking. Luckily, she is very good at being calm, which makes her reliable to other people and a natural leader to deal with issues effectively.

Through our 13-minute interview, I can perceive her caring heart. She asked me about my concerned issues and shared her experience with me which did give me a lot of strength. She also introduced a book to me after knowing the topic I was interested in. She mentioned that she was good at communicating with people, and I believe the key factor is that she has shown empathy during the communication. Also, she is a very good listener who could try to connect herself to other people’s feeling and share the experience to comfort other people. More, the ability to keep calm possessed by her, which is the most desired ability for me, is the decisive factor for being an effective leader. Basically, most of the practices of a leader could really use this ability, such as making decisions, negotiating, managing conflict, and so on. I really value the chance to talk to her next time and would like to learn from her in the future.

https://create.twu.ca/ldrs500/unit-6/unit-6-learning-activities/

Unit 6, Response

This is a response to Rob TegelBerg’s post https://create.twu.ca/robtegelberg/2018/02/11/learning-activity-6-4-response-to-unit-6/

Question: Which method of research would you likely use if you were going to turn your LDRS 591 research question into a full research study and why?

There is a great chance for me to choose a quantitative research because my research question is how to effectively help the adolescents manage their anxiety disorders and academic performance in the school setting. My study first will aim at exploring the relationship between academic performance and anxiety disorders of adolescent youth. The second aim is to examine whether a school-based intervention would facilitate the treatment of anxiety disorder and enhance the academic performance at the same time.

Since I want to describe the relationship between two variables, I will gather the data of dependent variable, independent variable, control variables, and confounding variables. Performance measure, attitude measure, and behavioural observation might be the instruments used to collect data. Unfortunately, I am weak at analyzing statistics and a little confused about the analysis software. I will work on it before the beginning of my study. Then I might choose a true experiment research design in my research. Therefore, I will have an intervention and state a research purpose focusing on testing the effect of the intervention. I am still not sure about the site and the participants because I want to consider more about the effect of different cultures and different geographical areas. But there will be two treatment groups including an intervention group and a control group, and the participants will be randomly assigned to the groups.

Those are all the details of the method I can think of right now. We all need to be well prepared for our study, and the procedures must be well-thought-out. I believe it is common to have confusions and to make mistakes during the research. That is why peer review is always highlighted for a study.

Unit 6, Learning activity 6.4

As a consumer of research reports, the most important things for me in the methods and results section of a high-quality qualitative research report are correctly identifying the type of the research design and applying own critical thinking to the data collection and the themes.

Reflecting on the knowledge I have gained this week, I find the hardest part for me is to identify the qualitative research design when the study does not explicitly state the type. Occasionally, I will mix the case study research design with the other types. Although there is a great difference between qualitative research and quantitative research, making sure the research design used in the study is the primary step. Unlike quantitative research which is quite easy to address the research design, the qualitative research has a much wider design list, especially some of them are quite similar. Table 9.1 on page 289 of the textbook has provided a useful summary of each type and can be used as a standard to identify the design of a study as well. Furthermore, preparing a close understanding of the key characteristics is extremely helpful for both recognizing the type and the quality of the research design, such as how the research problem has been raised, how the data is gathered and analyzed, and how the findings are illustrated.

Since the end of last week, I have realized the significant role of own critical thinking in reviewing the study. I think the procedures for data collection and analysis of the qualitative research are easier to understand but more complicated than those of the quantitative research. One’s own critical thinking is especially crucial for understanding a qualitative research because the purpose of it is to explore a central phenomenon. In addition, it is impossible for the researchers to be completely objective during the whole process of the study. For example, different researchers will not extract the same codes based on the words of the participants. Therefore, the findings built from the codes and coded data will be distinctive. Also, the themes emerged from the analysis of the data may address different major aspects. The readers have to be aware of the accuracy of the data and whether the coding procedures and the findings are justified and unbiased all the time.

Actually, keeping critical thinking is the most interesting part for me when reading a qualitative study. It is like a dialogue between me and the researchers in my mind. I would explore the ways they are using for understanding and studying the problem initially, then compare to my own feelings and suggestions about what they have found in the procedures of the exploration. And my question is:

How to balance the judgments generated by you in the process of reading the research article with the findings presented by the researchers, especially when they are apparently different?

Reference

Plano-Clark, V., & Creswell, J. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Unit 6 Learning Activities

Unit 6, Learning activity 6.3

Article

The Influence of Servant Leadership on Restaurant Employee Engagement

Quality Criteria

1.The analysis process used rigorous qualitative procedures.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The researchers stated in the study that transcription of the responses were derived from audio recording and a professional transcriber transferred verbal data to written form.

b) Rather than using computerized software that may prohibit the detection of subtle themes, the researchers adopted the strategy of manual coding through key-words-in-text to get a deeper insight to the meaning of words and themes.

c) Given the major concern of separating out personal bias or perceived conclusions, Epoche was applied to address the concern.

d) The researchers used the modified van Kaam method to analyze the data, The seven steps were presented thoroughly and this process led to the findings and themes based on the analyzed data.

e) Although the researchers did not claim clearly, I deemed the list of servant leader quality of Table 1 was the list of the in vivo codes summarized by the researchers.

Quality Criteria

2.Strategies were used to validate the findings.

Rate

2=Good

Evidence and/or Reasoning

Only bracketing and triangulation were identified to ensure the accuracy and credibility of the findings.

Quality Criteria

3.The findings include a description of the people, places, or events in the study.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The description of the detailed rendering of participants and places is in the method section.

b) The six questions are asked in a broad-to-narrow way.

c) The authors focus on facts and simply report the questions and answers in the results section, which are different from the themes representing the authors’ interpretations.

d) There are participants quotes under each question that provide emphasis and realism in the account.

Quality Criteria

4.The findings include appropriate themes about the central phenomenon.

Rate

2=Good

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) There are five themes reported.

b) The themes convey both major ideas about and the complexity of the central phenomenon. Theme 1 uses sub-themes and multiple perspectives; theme 2 uses literary devices and contrary opinion; theme 3 uses multiple perspectives; theme 4 uses sub-themes and multiple perspectives; theme 5 uses multiple perspectives.

c) There is no evidence of participant quotes appearing in the themes.

Quality Criteria

5.The findings relate multiple themes to each other.

Rate

2=Good

Evidence and/or Reasoning

The researchers analyze and report the interconnections among theme 4, theme 5 and other aspects in the discussion section. But the researchers have not conveyed the relationships among all five themes clearly in the text. However, the themes are interconnected and consistent with the overall case study research design.

Quality Criteria

6.The data analysis represents a good qualitative process.

Rate

2=Good

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) Although the data analysis is an inductive and interpretive process, I think the process lacks of dynamic.

b) The results emerge from the data are credible and accurate.

Quality Criteria

7.The findings provide a good exploration of the central phenomenon.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

The rigorous logic and detailed information of the findings make the findings perfect for answering the research questions.

Total Score = 17 (17-21 = High quality)

References

Carter, D., & Baghurst, T. (2014). The influence of servant leadership on restaurant employee engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 453-464.

Plano-Clark, V., & Creswell, J. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

https://create.twu.ca/ldrs591-sp18/unit-6-learning-activities/

 

Unit 6, Learning activity 6.2

Article

The Influence of Servant Leadership on Restaurant Employee Engagement

Quality Criteria

1.The sampling strategy is appropriate and justified.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The researchers explain clearly in the method section about the reason of intentionally choosing Celebration Restaurant as the site.

b) Although the researchers do not explicitly offer the name of the purposeful sampling strategy, it is easy to conclude that the maximal variation sampling strategy is adopted in this study. Because the participants are selected based on several criteria (Carter & Baghurst, 2014).

c) The procedures are fully described and match the maximal variation sampling strategy.

d) The researchers provide strong reasons for selecting the maximal variation sampling strategy in the beginning of the method section.

Quality Criteria

2.The sample size is appropriate and justified.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) There are 11 individuals participating the study, which means the sample size is sufficiently small so the researchers can capture rich detail.

b) The sample size is consistent with the case study research design.

c) A sound rationale is provided in the participants subsection to justify the sample size is appropriate.

Quality Criteria

3.The data types are appropriate.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

The researchers collect different types of data including focus group data, documented data, direct and non-obtrusive observations, and focus group interviews with open-ended semi-structured questions. These types are appropriate for the case study research design.

Quality Criteria

4.The data are gathered using rigorous qualitative procedures.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The researchers gather information using open-ended forms to learn about participants’ perspectives and experiences.

b) The data are tape recorded for professional transcription, and the researchers take notes as able.

Quality Criteria

5.Data collection issues are handled ethically and thoughtfully.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The participants have read the consent and confidentiality statements and they have the opportunity to withdraw their participation as well as reserve the right to withdraw their participation once the focus groups are completed.

b) The training room is selected for the convenience of the participants and to maintain a level of comfort for them.

c) The participants are compensated for their time.

Quality Criteria

6.The selected participants are information rich.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The sites and participants clearly fit the study purpose.

b) Two focus groups have achieved data saturation.

Quality Criteria

7.The database provides extensive and credible information about the central phenomenon.

Rate

2=Good

Evidence and/or Reasoning

The study does not explicitly present the extensive database, but the multiple types of open-ended data collected in two-month period are clearly related to the study’s intent.

Total Score = 20 (17-21 = High quality)

References

Carter, D., & Baghurst, T. (2014). The influence of servant leadership on restaurant employee engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 453-464.

Plano-Clark, V., & Creswell, J. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

https://create.twu.ca/ldrs591-sp18/unit-6-learning-activities/

Unit 6, Learning activity 6.1

Article

The Influence of Servant Leadership on Restaurant Employee Engagement

Quality Criteria

1.A research design guides the conduct of the qualitative study.

Rate

2=Good

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The researchers do not explicitly state the type of the research design, but they mention this article as a phenomenological study. Therefore, I believe this study adopts the case study research design.

b) The researchers correctly use several terms of a case study research design, such as themes. In addition, the research problem clearly calls for an in-depth exploration of understanding the influence of servant leadership on employee engagement from both a follower and leader perspective.

c) There is plenty of up-to-date literature cited in the study to support the research.

Quality Criteria

2.The choice of the research design is appropriate and justified.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The two research questions are clearly presented in the introduction section that aim to explore two cases: one is to explore the experience of servant leadership through lived-experience, the other one is to explore the experience and perception of employees.

b) The researchers illustrate the reason why the phenomenological study is used in this study right after the two research questions.

Quality Criteria

3.Good qualitative data collection procedures are used.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The procedures include collecting focus group data and documented data, direct and non-obtrusive observations, and interviews. The procedures are appropriate for the case study research design.

b) I think the procedures are used rigorously, although I have not finished reading chapter 10.

Quality Criteria

4.Good qualitative data analysis procedures are used.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The researchers use a seven-step process to analyze data and they state that this process has led to findings and themes based on the analyzed data.

b) The researchers particularly identify the five themes in a section. Although I am not familiar with the procedures of analyzing themes, I think they are rigorous.

Quality Criteria

5.Good qualitative results and interpretations are reported.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

a) The results section includes a rich description of the focus group responses and a thorough presentation of the themes.

b) Although I am not familiar with the procedures of analyzing results, I think  they are rigorous.

Quality Criteria

6.The study used a rigorous research design.

Rate

2=Good

Evidence and/or Reasoning

Given the qualitative design is a case study research design, most of the elements of a case study design could be identified are depicted in a logical and coherent way.

Quality Criteria

7.The use of the qualitative research design addressed the study’s purpose.

Rate

3=Excellent

Evidence and/or Reasoning

The researchers analyze the findings from different aspects, and all the findings provide a rich exploration that answers the study’s research questions.

Total Score = 19 (17-21 = High quality)

References

Carter, D., & Baghurst, T. (2014). The influence of servant leadership on restaurant employee engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 453-464.

Plano-Clark, V., & Creswell, J. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

 

Unit 6 Learning Activities