marcelowarkentin

a TWU MAL student

Some thoughts on “These Are A Few Of My Favorite Things”

Some thoughts on These Are A Few Of My Favorite Things

The original can be found here:

♫♪♫♪♪ These are a Few of My Favourite Things ♫♪♫♪♪ (8.1 competencies)

Sally, great stuff. It was with great joy that I read your post. How about it, your least essential principles were the same I chose.

Under strategic planning, you mentioned that one needs to start with self-change first. How true is that? Since I began the masters, I have become aware in a new way how important it is, to start with self. Who am I? How do I lead? What kind of an example am I? These questions are so important as I lead others. But, this self-search is wasteful if we don’t understand that God created us for a purpose. Once we understand that principle, everything else will be much easier.

Created in God’s image and for a purpose brings me to one of your least essential principles, which is “involving the right people for the right decision.” It is not always possible, as you said. I would also like to bring in another idea I discussed with Dr. Wu during the summer classes 2017. What if God has something else in mind? What if the people we strategically think are best are not the ones God had planned? If it would be up to the prophet Samuel, David had never become King (1 Samuel 16). If we were supposed to choose a leader to take the Israelites out of Egypt, we had never chosen Moses. The guy could not even speak. How about the disciples? That would be like choosing bricklayers here in Paraguay to lead a country. Non-sense.

As a Christian strategic leader, we need to be in tune with what God wants and how He leads us. If we are lead by God in the first place, we can strategically lead others.

Blessings,

Some thoughts on Vision and visualization (from Samson) + Christian education

Some thoughts on Vision and visualization (from Samson) + Christian education.

The original can be found here:

Vision and Visualization

 

Thank you, Samson, for your insight on vision and visualization and how they differ from each other. I love sports and thanks for giving this example from Michael Phelps. Some years ago, when I still helped coach a high school soccer team in Indiana, we also used visualization days before any game. These visualization sessions became quite significant as we started to win games in the postseason. That year we reached the final four in the state. We did have a great team that year but I can also say that visualization helped put the guys more at ease. During the visualization sessions, we walked through the whole pre-game, the game itself, and post-game scenarios.

I wonder how visualization can take shape at a school environment. Payne (2015) gives a few examples of how to practice it daily. These practices are meditation processes. As a Christian school, we take time every morning at our school to meditate on God’s Word but we fail to take the next step and help the kids visualize how these Words can become reality in their lives. Many of our students suffer from low self-esteem and they could benefit from visioning, visualization, and meditating to connect their lives to God’s Word. I believe since God is our creator, He knows us best, and we can help students foster better self-esteem through these practices.

 

Reference:

Payne, T. (2015, April 26). Visualization vs. Visioning: The Difference. Huffington Post. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/tova-payne/visualization-vs-visionin_b_7145140.html

Contextualizing

Contextualizing

Human Development and Poverty

These last few weeks we have had the chance to read, discuss, analyze, interpret, and implement new concepts and skills related to strategic leadership. We were challenged to think in new ways and integrate new learning.

It is quite sobering to see the cutting edge of leadership in top performing companies around the globe and the ideas proposed by the different authors. How can these leadership strategies relate to me in a third world country, working as a principal in one of the most impoverished states in Paraguay?

By the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Paraguay is today in the 111th place from 187 nations in human development (“Human Development Reports,” 2013, p. 1). In a similar study done by UNDP in Spanish, the Departamento de Caaguazu (or the State of Caaguazu) is considered to be even thirty years behind the capital Asunción in human development (“Evaluación del desarrollo,” 2012, p. 25). The state of Caaguazu is considered to have the lowest income per capita in the country and consequently has the highest percentage of people living in poverty (p. 24). Our school is in the state of Caaguazu.

Poverty lays in stark contrast with those that have greater economic stability. Even though we live in an impoverished state, our city is considered to be the industrial capital of Paraguay. There are more than nineteen flour mills in our area. Living and working in a region with both poverty and wealth has its challenges. In 2013, after I had been working as a principal for one year, I was visited by a college professor from the USA whose daughters I had taught Spanish in high school. After a few days in Paraguay and after learning about our school, the region, and what we were trying to accomplish he asked, “don´t you feel inside a freak show?” We live in a bizarre world, and it is difficult to explain when you see the rich and poor living side by side.

Similarly, we have at our school children from wealthy and low-income families attending and participating in the same classes. Our school is a paradise and a haven for many, especially those that do have enough food on the table. Helio Vera once said that Paraguay is the cemetery of all theories because all or none of the social theories are applicable here (as cited in Neufeld, 2006, p. 64) These words highlight why this job is so much of a faith job. One has to believe beyond of what one can see. The reality of our region and how we try to transform children through education encourages us to work by faith.

Competencies

We are lightyears away from what Galbraith (2014), Hughes, Colarelli-Beatty, and Dinwoodie (2014), Lepsinger (2010), and Ungerer, Ungerer, and Herholdt (2016) speak about, and yet, some concepts are very strategic and necessary in my context. From Hughes (2014) I consider managing conflicting perspectives, influence across the organization, building collaborative relationships, and adapt to new conditions as competencies that I can incorporate into my school (p. 268, 269). Quite often people have conflicting perspectives, especially when they come from different social classes. I also need to be able to persuade my staff of our vision and mission. People have a difficulty working together as we are continually implementing new ideas and I need to help my team adapt to these new conditions.

No less important are some of the competencies which Ungerer (2016) proposes, such as creativity, curiosity, and social intelligence (p. 44). I take these competencies in particular regard as I learn to deal with different cultures. Among our staff, students, and parents, we have Brazilians, Paraguayans, Germans-Mennonites, and Amish. It takes curiosity to learn about each culture, it takes creativity to work with each one of them, and social intelligence to know what touches the heart of each cultural group.

I believe the word synergy described by Galbraith (2014) is potent because it represents the possibilities of people achieving together more than what they would achieve alone (p. 255). But, for synergy to happen, it means people need to trust each other. We lack trust in each other to work in synergy fully. Today, I still live in a culture of mistrust, which stands in the way of creating synergy. Not all staff are ready to collaborate, share, and unit forces. I believe the time will come when it will be possible. For now, it is crucial to increase the trust as I show confidence in them.

Principles

The three principles that I would like to incorporate in my school are strategic thinking from Hughes (2014) and Lepsinger´s (2010) Bridge Builders 2 and 3, expect top performance and hold people accountable. To think strategically one should consider not just about the present but also the future; I should have clear goals and incorporate ideas from others. Under this principle, I was especially intrigued by the idea of trusting your insight and imagination (p. 66). I would say this is where faith comes in. No leader can only rely on his insight or just on the insight of others. We are God´s creation, and the Creator eagerly wants to lead us when we are paying attention to His leading. When we are in a personal relationship with God, He will lead us through insight and imagination.

Lepsinger (2010) says that we should hold people accountable and expect our staff to show top performance. Although it is not acceptable to underperform, I live in a culture that does not take a job well done very serious. People are generally very relaxed. As a result, they will work on their own pace. People also have low expectations of themselves which leads to underperformance. Most do not understand their capacity. I have to tell my students very often that God has gifted them and that they can achieve much more than what they believe.

Accountability is another principle that is seen very differently in Paraguay. I believe it is relevant and applicable to our reality but not welcomed. Generally, people see accountability as someone that does not know how to mind their own business. Most of this has to do with the lack of trust between people. Even though these principles are difficult to implement they are much needed.

Some principles seem very challenging to implement at a non-for-profit Christian school organization when compared to the business world. Under the reward system I am not able to give teachers a raise or to give out promotions to any teacher, even though I believe he or she deserves it (Galbraith, 2014, p. 50). Galbraith (2014) also suggest interdepartmental rotation in a lateral organization (p.79). In a small school like ours, it is not possible to rotate people or teachers. Most times a department is represented by one teacher. Also, it is not as easy to change a structure in a school setting as it would be in business.

Besides these principles and ideas, I also would like to return to an idea I mentioned in my blog post 3.1

MSSL ET1 – “El Equipo Directivo”

Lepsinger (2010) speaks about involving the right people in making the best decisions (p.112), and Hughes (2014) talks about having the right mix of people for top performance (p.201). In my context, these principles are difficult at this point because it still happens that I have people occupying a job position not because they are the right people but because they are the only ones that were available. Human development is a great challenge.

Text Material

I have found Galbraith (2014) to be very challenging to contextualize into my school reality. There were some concepts that I could apply, but it took significant effort to see the connections between the business model and my school.  I wonder if there are other books related to strategic leadership in an educational institution.

 

References

Evaluación del desarrollo humano en Paraguay. (2012). Cuaderno de Desarrollo Humano, 1-55.

Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hughes, R., Colarelli-Beatty, K., & Dinwoodie, D. (2014). Becoming a strategic leader. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Human Development Reports. (2013). Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/education-index

Neufeld, A. (2006). Contra la sagrada resignación. Asunción: Editorial El Lector.

Ungerer, M., Ungerer, G., & Herholdt, J. (2016). Navigating strategic possibilities. [Kindle]. Retrieved from www.kr.co.za

Whatsapp communication and Paraguayan Competition

Italy’s Gianluca Zambrotta, left, fights for the ball with Paraguay’s Antolin Alcaraz during the World Cup group F soccer match between Italy and Paraguay in Cape Town, South Africa, Monday, June 14, 2010. (AP Photo/Schalk van Zuydam)

Thoughts on RESPONSE TO ADVANCING ORGANIZATION BY CONFLICT RESOLUTION

The original can be found here:

Response to Advancing Organization by Conflict Resolution

Thank you, Pierre, for your questions and thoughts on Avisha’s post. You are always clear and to the point. A great gift.

Communication is part of Lepsinger’s  (2010) Cooperation Builder 1 (p. 173). I have realized these last few years that we never communicate enough. I have a weekly meeting with my school’s leadership team and then an individual meeting with each one of the members every week as well. Besides, my doors are always open to the team, who can drop in as many times as they want without setting an appointment. If they see the door open, they can come in. The rest of the staff members usually go through my secretary to set up an appointment. I try to keep an open-door policy as much as possible. There are still times where we assume others can read our minds and understand what we want (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 174). I would say that in the last two years we have also used WhatsApp quite often at school. It is becoming our primary form of communication. We have a staff group, the leadership team group, teacher group, and many others. We also have parents groups, and each class has a group. It is actually for us much more efficient than email since most low-income parents do not have computers but will have a cell phone.

Regarding competition, I would like to mention a few cultural habits that hinder cooperation and transparency. It seems that there is a natural tendency to compete here in Paraguay. I have seen the difference between people playing soccer here and in the US. There is a drastic difference. Any friendly game of soccer here is fearlessly played. A reason I have stopped playing since I still want to come to work the next day with both my legs in one piece. I switched to running the last three years. Now I only play with my 8-year-old son. This competitive spirit is brought into work as well. The following examples are seen in the culture around us and not necessarily at our school:

  • There is a habit that newcomers need to “ganar el derecho de piso” (gain the right to the floor). It means they need first to pay their dos as they start a new job.
  • There is also the habit of “pasar la factura” (give him/her the bill). It means that if you make a mistake with someone, that person will pay it back at some point later. My brother has worked with natives in northern Paraguay, and he said that they have an incredible capacity to remember things that people have done to them, good or bad. This ability seems to have stayed present in the Paraguayan culture.
  • My last example comes from this week. I had a birthday, and we celebrated it with a get-together. Paraguayans love to celebrate, and so do I. But some people seem to compete to see who gives the best present. Not something I encourage. Others give the present to gain favor with the “boss” and get the upper hand.

 

Reference:

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap: How great leaders and their companies get results. Jossey Bass.

Being Missional – Thought on Blog 7.1 Response to Rob: Conflict and Cooperation

Thought on Blog 7.1 Response to Rob: Conflict and Cooperation

Retrieved from:

Blog 7.1 Response to Rob: Conflict and Cooperation

Thank you, Sea Breeze, on your thoughts on working at different schools.

I have only worked at Christian schools in the past eighteen years. Twelve years in the USA and six years now in Paraguay. I went to high school at a public school in Brazil but never worked in such an environment. I did have the chance to work at a factory for one year between high school and college, which gave me an interesting perspective on working at a secular environment.

From what I have experienced, Christian schools can have two different purposes, or two different missions and visions. At least this is what I have seen, not just in the US but also here in Paraguay. One purpose would be to maintain the culture if a majority of students come from Christian families and another is being missional when the purpose is to bring students into a new relationship in Christ. In this case, the majority of the students come from non-Christian families. I understand that although students may come from Christian families, it does not mean they will have a personal relationship with Christ.

While in the US I worked for a school that had the purpose to maintain the Christian culture. Majority of students were from Christian families, and the institution assumed that people had an understanding of what it meant to be Christian. The purpose was not to evangelize. Some of this also had to do with the particular denomination the school was part of. In my personal opinion, I see more cons than pros with such schools. It was a great place to work, very professional and caring but we failed to see the need to bring students into a personal relationship with Christ.

I am a principal now of a school which has the purpose to be missional and brings kids into a relationship with Christ. We do have students that come from Christian families, but we don’t recruit them. They naturally come to us. Most of our students have very little knowledge of the Bible and who Christ is. It gives me great energy to work in such a place. As Wolters (2005) says, we are in the job of helping to reconcile the world with the Father (loc. 141). We are healing and restoring what is fallen (loc. 860).

As in any organization, it is important to have the MVV clear since it can also add to additional conflict. On the other hand, conflict is sometimes unavoidable since we are humans. As you said, in some institutions conflict destroys the environment and can make daily routines very difficult. As an administrator, I have learned much about how to manage conflict. I am learning to take conflict as an opportunity to grow. I am learning to see conflict as something God has permitted to help me grow personally and professionally. It is very difficult at the moment to see what God is doing.

Blessings,

 

Reference:

Wolters, A. M. (2005). In Creation Regained: Biblical Basics for a Reformational Worldview [Kindle version] (Second ed., Loc. 1-1582). Retrieved from www.amazon.com

 

 

« Older posts

© 2026 marcelowarkentin

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑