Response to Sadie’s thoughts on the Catholic School Dilemma & Strategic Leadership

Blog 4 Response to Sadie

Thanks for sharing your thoughts and reflections on the Catholic School system and the struggles you face.

“In my experience, the most Catholic students that I have had in my class in one year is 6/26 students. In other years, the numbers have been lower. This problem poses a threat to our public identity. I wonder if this is a problem that the school and the church need to work together on to try and solve.”  I definitely believe the Catholic and Christian schools need to work together to help resolve this issue. When I worked in Ontario, there was a Catholic Public school board as well. It had a very strict policy in place as a friend of mine had her boys in that system. Her husband was Catholic and the Catholic school board mandate was at least one parent had to be a practicing Catholic who attended mass. They also needed a letter from the priest for the application. The Catholic school board, even though it was public, still had some tight controls on who could attend. One thing that set them apart from the regular public system was its uniform policy. Anyone who attended the Catholic school system got to wear a uniform unlike the regular public school.  That was one thing that made it attractive and I’m sure some parents found a way around the barriers if they were determined to have their children attend the school in the neighborhood. Perhaps some were sold on the idea of uniform. At the end of the day, I think your situation is a reflection of the administration and their leniency in allowing anyone to attend rather than true devout believers and their children. Perhaps it is also their hope that students’ hear the Good News of the Gospel message and become spiritual once they attend the school for a while.

“If I had the ‘chance to change this,’ I would. In Canada, there is a threat to Catholic education. I would like to see this changed as I truly believe in the values taught in our school system.” I wonder if there are other Catholic school educators who feel the same way you do. Maybe by voicing your concerns with like-minded people, you can start a grass roots movement to implement positive change.

 

“At times it can be shocking how some people conduct themselves.” What has shocked you exactly?  “I have tried many different techniques in hopes of improving the culture in our organization, however I have not experienced a lot of success.” Can you elaborate a little more? What kind of techniques have you tried specifically?

“They usually exhibit negative attitudes about policies, procedures and updates in the education system.” This sounds like you work with a lot of disgruntled older teachers who maybe should have already retired? This make some wonder what can be done to keep all educators at their peak right until they retire? Why do so many become complacent? I think an important aspect could have to do with the school vision. Sergiovanni (2007) states “When a school vision embodies the sharing of ideals, a covenant is created that bonds together leader and led in a common cause” (p.75). Perhaps this is the bridge which deteriorates the longer teachers teach.

They view the ‘old’ way as the ‘right’ way and are resistant to change. For the newer staff, this can be draining. For example, I took it upon myself in my first two years to try and start a social committee.” I used to be the social committee liason when I taught at a Christian school in Ontario. That was a lot of fun! I planned a fondue party at our home for the staff and organized tickets to the Broadway musical the Lion King. We would go to dinner at a Chinese buffet restaurant every Christmas (that was tradition) and our staff were very engaged in the activities of the mother church which sponsored our school even though some of us came from different Christian denominations.  Our staff was quite young and all of the young teachers did not yet have children when I was teaching, so it was easy to engage everyone in social activities. Harris (2014) talks at length about the importance of building social capital. She asserts “relationships matter” …”it is what those relationships actually achieve that matters most of all” (p.80). Furthermore, she goes on to add “relationship building with purpose is far more likely to secure productive and positive change” (p.81).

I find it takes strength and courage to be patient, and not have resentful feelings towards people on staff with such attitudes. I find that too, but in different ways. One older teacher librarian, close to retirement, is causing me some pushback, which I know is simply because she has a different worldview than me. I am learning to practice boundaries with this particular teacher and I have learned to keep my distance from her and to limit what I share. One example was a conversation we were casually having about the up-coming municipal election and the topic of school trustees was up for discussion. I shared who I was planning on supporting when this teacher said I should not vote for “her” because she did not outright say she was supporting (a hot topic issue). This “issue” goes against my Christian values. She then went on to inform me that she listens to the Langley Teachers Association (LTA) recommendations when she goes to vote. This is just a reminder that my theistic worldview will clash with those who have a different worldview than me. Sire (2009) writes “God has revealed his standard in the various laws and principles in the Bible…There is thus a standard of right and wrong, and people who want to know it can know it” (p.42). People who have negative attitudes or who are rough and abrasive and living outside the love of Christ need to be brought into the light in order for them to see the bigger picture.

 

“I have noticed in our organization that the only staff that is recognized for excellence is the staff that go above and beyond their daily duties. However, I believe that everyone can relate to the famous words, “it’s the little things in life that matter or the little things that count.” Perhaps these little things need to be recognized as well.” I agree with you one hundred percent. Certainly, as we have been learning about building culture in our schools and reflecting on what it means to be a transformational leader, everything we say and do has ripple effects. Sergiovanni (2014) writes “the purpose of purposing is to build within the school a center of shared values that transforms it from a mere organization into a covenantal community” (p.54).

I spoke with a staff member who was feeling particularly unhappy in our team last year and she told me that she feels like she never gets recognized for her work in the school. Although her work may not be as noticeable as some of the other staff members work, it is still significant, takes time out of her personal life and perhaps she would feel a part of the team if she were recognized.” Sadie you have a valid point here. I know it is important to feel part of a team. Once you have this feeling of belonging you naturally start looking for ways to advance the whole.  At one of my old Christian schools in Ontario, they had some really great ideas to bond as a staff. Not only did this school always make a point of going away as an entire school in September for camp (grade 9, 10’s and 11’s one week and grade 12’s a different week) this school also encouraged staff to notice what others are doing and to write notes of encouragement to each other. This was so positive and uplifting, receiving such thoughtful words of encouragement from my colleagues. It also made me more cognitive to recognize special things others were doing around me. This school was overflowing in the love of the Holy Spirit. It was bar none the best formative spiritual growth for me as a new believer back in the day and will always hold a dear spot in my heart. I really received a strong foundation of faith from my colleagues and administrative staff. The administrators were my first examples of transformational servant leaders and that goes back to 2000-2003.

“If an employee does demonstrate defensiveness, don’t let his attitude “push your buttons” and cause you to become angry or more strident in your efforts to convince him that he should take responsibility and own the problem” (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 74).”

“Disorganization in time management. Although I hold myself accountable for completing tasks, I am sometimes disorganized in my time management. I often feel that I have time for everything and will commit to far too many things. This often leaves me up at all hours of the night in order to complete tasks on time. Lepsinger (2010) writes, “select the potential problems that should be addressed, starting, of course, with those that are high probability and high impact and working your way down to lower levels of probability and impact” (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 44). Prioritizing and organizing will help me to make more efficient use of my time.” I like your thoughts here and share similar concerns. I find it difficult to say “no” to anything when I am really interested. I know I have too many things on my plate but rather than disappointing people I just have to learn how to juggle more and more balls. Hughes et al., (2014) call it strategic acting which “requires attending to both short-term and long-term objectives” (p.107). Prioritizing and organizing your tasks while keeping your short and long term goals in mind will not only help you achieve your goals but also help you feel more in control.

 

References

Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, Practicalities and Potential.

Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Hughes R., Colarelli-Beatty K. & Dinwoodie  D. (2014) Becoming a strategic leader. San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass Second Edition.

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sergiovanni, T. (2007). Rethinking leadership (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Corwin Press.

Response to Stella’s Blog 4 Strategic Leadership

Blog Post 4 Response Stella

“If only I had the chance to make a difference in how we do things around here,” Yes, I have had these same thoughts while working for the school district and while living here in Langley Township. You are very fortunate in your new role as VP to be able to implement change.

“Therefore, I would love to see the Board approve the addition of more tiers on the pay scale. As well, there is no bonus structure for our staff yet there are some employees who have an exemplary work ethic. I would love to create a bonus system for the staff members who meet the published expectations and also those who are informal leaders.” Why do you feel informal leaders should receive a bonus? Are you thinking of a monetary bonus?

You wrote “we adhere to the compensation structure as published by SCSBC, which has a maximum of ten years’ experience on the pay scale.” I wonder what you mean by this. Can you elaborate a bit more? Must teachers work ten years before they are eligible for a bonus?

You also wrote “there is no bonus structure for our staff.” To my knowledge, in public education there are no bonus incentives for exemplary teachers. I know that such a system exists in the United States and wonder if that is something we should introduce in Canada? There must be a reason why we have not adopted this system? I would love further insight into this topic. What are the pros and cons of offering a bonus structure for teachers who go above and beyond in their teaching? The only thing I am familiar with is the Prime Minister’s Awards for Teaching Excellence and Teaching Excellence in STEM (Sector, 2018).

“In a recent tweet, Kevin Visscher wrote, “If our school would disappear tomorrow, would the community we are part of, miss us?” As independent schools, we are sometimes engulfed by the public sector around us, leaving us to wonder what mark we are making on the community as a whole.” I can speak for my daughter’s independent Christian school. I believe they have made a significant mark in their community. Not only is their school campus, a beautifully manicured and spacious property with attractive buildings which showcase to the community that they take great pride in being good stewards of their neighbourhood. They also have graciously opened their doors to the community. The Chandos Pavilion is used for many outside events that take place including both Surrey and Langley School District graduation ceremonies in June, as well as other guest speakers and events on the weekend. Their new church building, the Mary Pattison Chapel is home to the Pentecostal Tabernacle church. My high school has also become an integral part of the Walnut Grove Community. It too is located in a beautiful green belt adjacent to the community rec center. Our school track is used by the community for jogging. Our school provides education for 2040 students. It is home to a culinary Chef training program and sells delicious food for an affordable price to the community. Our school has been used for a Citizenship Ceremony and hosts numerous sporting events as well as summer school within the district. Walnut Grove Secondary (WGSS) is an important fixture in our community and would most certainly be missed if its presence was not there any longer.

What about morale?

“Lepsinger (2010) is “surprised by how tolerant many managers are of people who exhibit below-standard performance” (p. 51). In my six weeks as a senior administrator, I’m surprised by how many people work at below-standard expectations.” Stella, can you elaborate a bit here? In what ways are you noticing your staff is working at below-level standards? “There has been a shock in my high school team with my new accountability practices.” Can you share what new practices you have employed?

“However, I find I must fight the desire to tolerate poor performance!” I know that feeling and wonder how department heads and administration can discipline teachers who do not make adequate effort in employing the core competencies? Since unionized teachers have autonomy in their lesson planning and what they teach, I wonder if any protocol measures exist. In my husband’s line of work, if he does not perform according to the North American business culture and bring in lots of sales, he is simply fired.

Unlike the unforgiving business world, where there is no job security, some unionized employees, like the SEA’s and the Janitors at my school and other public school’s I’ve taught at always seem to maximize their “rights” and take advantage of their coffee break. I always see them in the staff room taking breaks. The unionized work environment certainly seems to breed a different work ethic, altogether. Instead of employees striving to outperform one another there is an atmosphere of complacency and just doing what is required according to the job requirement and nothing more. Sometimes unionized teachers may fall into this trap as well, especially teachers who are close to their retirement and who are just tired from so many curriculum changes.

“But it is difficult to approach someone who is not even trying.” This is certainly an interesting dilemma and not an easy one to overcome. Again, this is a question I would like more feedback on. If I were an administrator, I have no idea what steps and procedures must be adhered to in order to turn the situation around? I would hope this information is eventually passed on to me in my educational leadership training for public school administrators. According to Lepsinger (2010) in the business world he asserts in order for a leader to coax an under-performing employee to pick up their socks the leader must focus on things which they are doing well. He writes “even your worst performers do something well” and “find the thing your marginal employee currently does well, no matter how small, and focus on that” (p.58).

“I would love to have my entire staff in the performance review process, yet the school protocol is just a few people per year. Many teachers have slipped through the cracks without much accountability” My colleague says that he has never been evaluated in the last twenty years of teaching. If this is a reality in public school teaching then it is quite understandable that there will be teachers who “fall through the cracks.” This does not make any sense to me. The system does not seem well organized. How is it that in order to get into a B. Ed program at university you need to meet so many requirements, GPA’s etc.., volunteer hours in your teachable area etc.. Then once you are in the program and survive the course work you may only do your practicum in a subject area where you have the bulk of credit hours. The irony being once you walk off the stage with your teacher degree (specializing for example in high school), you are called in to teach in elementary. Then, most often your first bonafide teaching assignments are not in the subject area you trained in. There are so many hoops to jump through but once you get your assignment then there are no further tests or evaluations to keep you striving for perfection.

“My new systems are causing anxiety in many.” I wonder what your new system looks like?

“My desire to reform things must be tempered with creating strategies for gradual improvement in productivity rather than expecting everything from very little.” According to Hughes, Beatty and Dinwoodie (2014) “For teams to act strategically, they must foster a climate of learning in the team itself” (p.215). I’m wondering if it might help your staff buy-in to your desire to see the best in everyone if your school would invest more time in a staff retreat at the start of the school year, perhaps the last week in August when most Christian schools are back to work.

“If I could just add more hours onto a day, I think I could reverse the negative effects of poor organizational decisions from the past! Time, the limiting factor for most leaders, is required to implement new ways. So how does one build trust and cooperation when time is limited?” You’ve asked the million dollar question. However, as much as time can be an Achilles heel, Hughes et al., (2014) asks “Do team members trust each other? If they don’t, then mutual influence and effective collaboration become quite difficult” (p.209). It seems that schools are in a state of constant renewal. Every year teachers come and teachers go (retire/change schools/move into the admin. or are promoted to the school board office; student’s graduate and new students arrive into the school building. Under such an environment, all invested need to continuously readjust and find ways to trust their new colleagues. This process might move along better in a school where everyone buys into the school vision and mission.

A great post Stella. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

References:

Hughes R., Colarelli-Beatty K. & Dinwoodie D. (2014) Becoming a strategic leader. San  Francisco: Jossey-Bass Second Edition.

Kevin Visscher. (2018, Oct. 18). [Tweet] Retrieved from https://twitter.com/KevinVisscher/status/1053150148333731840

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sector, S. A. (2018, October 05). Prime Minister’s Awards for Teaching Excellence and Teaching Excellence in STEM. Retrieved October 25, 2018, from https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/pmate-ppmee.nsf/eng/home

Post 4.1 Shifting from Negative to Positive

Post 4.1; ldrs501; Health & Education

  1. Outline the best steps you envision for developing performance best practices across all areas of the organization where you work/worked previously; addressing the various components of the organization like.
    • Human resources (policies and procedures)

I do not know anything about human resources (HR) and what their policies or procedures are for the Langley School District 35. The HR department is located at the School board headquarters for Langley in Murrayville. The only way I have had any dealings with the school board is when I was hired. There was paperwork to be filled out and they helped me understand the teacher-on-call telephone system. As far as my day-to-day work goes, I rarely ever have contact with them, although I did call HR two weeks ago to verify that my days off work for last week had been accurately entered into the on-line system.

  • Corporate identity (public)

The Langley School District public image has improved. When we first moved to the district back in 2010 I recall the school district being in the news quite frequently because of over spending issues and the district not having enough money. I think they had a reputation of having the least money out of all the school districts in the lower mainland. Not to mention, they had also fired some board members or something to that effect. The school board was put on the hotspot for really bad management of school funds. At least that is what I have in my memory, but at the time I was not working for the school district, so I did not have all the facts.  Eight months after moving to Langley our daughter started pre-school at Langley Christian (LCS) and then changed Christian schools in kindergarten moving to Pacific Academy (PA). Around that same time we received a phone call from the school board saying there was a spot for our daughter at one of the French Immersion schools in the district (Brookswood). So, I went for a tour and was flabbergasted at the poor state of the school. The school itself was neglected and in bad need of repairs. I recall walking through the halls and seeing bulletin boards falling off the wall and ceilings I could almost touch. The environment was not welcoming at all, but very dark, not much light. In my mind, I was comparing this to LCS, PA and former private schools where I had taught in the past. My expectations were very high but we only want the very best for our children and aside from this school not having a Christian mandate its environment was not welcoming.

More recently, while completing my Bachelor of Education at TWU I learned from one of my Profs what an amazing reputation the Langley School District has for its implementation of Aboriginal perspective and knowledge in the school curriculum. 

  • Organizational culture (internal)

Working for the Langley School District today I can say that I am proud to work for the district. Over the few years I have been employed by the district I feel like we are a family. It has helped by working as a teacher-on-call and being able to work at various schools within the district and then having done my practicum in one high school and having taught at two other high schools now within the district. At Pro D events we all come together and re-unite with each other. Likewise, if you are a coach then this is more constant as you keep re-connecting with other schools at all the sporting events throughout the year.

Teachers for the most part seem connected and happy, but at the same time, the new teachers might feel a bit lost and disconnected. I was talking to one of my colleagues who is also doing her Masters right now and she is looking at teacher health. Apparently, there are many teachers who feel they are over-worked and have no balance in their lives. She wants to address this in creating a new program at our school and perhaps going district wide with this initiative.

  1. Identify some of the negative organizational renewal, execution and design challenges in the organization where you work/worked previously to address:
    • The biggest impact these principles have/had on the organization where you work/worked previously.

I have worked under ten different principals and have seen and experienced different styles of leadership in both Christian schools, secular private schools and the public system. I have experienced everything from the transformational servant leadership style which was demonstrated by a principal at a Christian school in Toronto to the micromanager style of management which was spear headed by a female principal. I have had principals who are never at school because they are always at the school board office attending meetings or travelling and representing the school. These kind of principals were at two IB schools. I have only worked under female leadership three times and only once was it in a high school setting, the other two times it was in elementary schools.

I cannot think of any really negative organizational renewal challenges with any of the principals I have worked under. Trying to think back over 25 years ago when I had my first part time job at McDonald’s and Superstore, I vaguely remember who my bosses were? My current principal seems to be doing a great job in his role. He’s certainly very experienced as he has been working in the district for 30 years and has been a principal at a few schools before being transferred to our school. He’s now going to probably remain at our school until he retires. Last year, was his first year and one thing I noticed, he was not very present that first year. He observed the happenings of our school but appeared to be observing more than initiating any changes. This aligns with what I have read in the literature (Hord and Roussin, 2013). This year however, has been very different. For one, our principal walks the halls frequently and visits our classes more often. At our last Pro D he had us all collaboratively have input into a SWAT for our school vision and mission. Hord and Roussin (2013) contend that “effective leaders continually check current performance against the vision” (p.16).  One thing I have noticed this principal do well is acknowledge when you are doing something well. Even last year, when I was knew my principal would frequently give praise to teachers for outstanding efforts. It was nice to be acknowledged in that way. Hord and Roussin (2013) state “Effective leaders also look for positive progress and directly and sincerely recognize and praise teachers (p.17).

  • Three to five steps necessary to shift the negative impacts and help the organization where you work/worked previously refocus to reclaim organizational purpose, practice and procedures to a healthy level so they can move more effectively into the future.
  • According to Hord and Roussin (2013) there are six strategies that can be employed by school leaders whose goal is to change the direction of a school culture, vision or mission:

Step 1 Creating an atmosphere and context for change

When I started teaching in the Langley School District change was in the air. The province had mandated that a new school curriculum should be employed. Of course this was a time of much friction as many teachers were not automatically sold by this new idea. Bringing teachers on board to collaboratively reflect on what has worked and what is not working sets the stage for change. Hord and Roussin (2013) purport “creating a context conducive to change one will see the entire professional staff coming together to reflect on how they are working to achieve goals for their students” (p.14).

Step 2 Developing and communicating a shared vision

As we have read and discussed, having a clear vision is necessary in order for everyone to be on the same page.  According to Hord and Roussin “(2013) having a clear vision “refers to mental pictures of what a school or a classroom might look like in a changed and improved state-a preferred image of the future” (p.14). They go on to say “effective leaders use every opportunity to refer to the vision of the school during school and community meetings, personal interactions, and written communications” (p.15). Likewise, Galbraith (2014) speaks about the importance of having a common culture which acts as the glue that holds everyone together (p. 200).

Step 3 Planning and providing resources

Hord and Roussin (2013) assert “In effective schools, resources are allocated, and reallocated, in ways that maximize teacher learning, organizational learning and, thus, student learning” (p.15). In order for teachers to do their job well they need to be equipped with the right resources. However, in a time with little funding and sparse school board budgets it can be very challenging.

Step 4 Investing in professional development

Whenever there is a curriculum change new resources are required along with training sessions for teachers. Hord and Roussin (2010) point out that effective leaders “encourage a deep understanding of new ideas through collegial learning opportunities” (p.16). They also go on to say how “enlightened districts are providing schedules where student early release days permits the professional staff to come together regularly and frequently for faculty study” (p.16). In school district 35 we have at least six early release days for teacher collaboration within the school calendar.

Step 5 Checking progress

Once a new curriculum has been employed it is necessary to check in to see how it is being implemented and received by students.  One thing effective leaders do is “continually check current performance against the vision” (p. 16). At my school this is done through Survey Monkey and departmental meeting discussions which are reported back to the principal.

Step 6 Continuing to give assistance

It is important that there is a long window of opportunity for teachers to receive support and peer coaching as they transition from the old method to the new. After dappling with WordPress for the past month and a bit, it is nice to know that Colin is still available for assistance. According to Hord and Roussin (2010) another thing effective schools do is “provide support for each other including peer coaching and mentoring” (p.17). Likewise, effective leaders recognize the value of “celebrating successes” and “praising teachers” for their efforts (p.17). This goes hand-in-hand with Lepsinger’s (2010) idea of “enhancing and maintaining employee self-esteem” (p.59).  Teachers who must make significant adaptations to their teaching methodology may feel incompetent to grasp the new concepts. I am feeling this way at the moment with WordPress and posting work that involves many steps and adding hashtags etc.. It’s all new and uncomfortable. A leader who can come along and “strengthen a person’s belief in his own competence is a foundation of effective management” (p.59).

 

  1. Three things you do (3+3+3 = 9 altogether):
    • To promote the positive renewal, execution and organizational design principles in your career practice.
  1. Pro D– All teachers are required to attend Professional development days which are planned on specific days throughout the school year. I attend these and look forward to collaborating and learning new teaching tools which will help enhance my lesson/unit plans and assessment.
  2. Collaboration Days– Each school in the district offers its staff collaboration days. There are a number old such days scheduled in the calendar and this gives teachers and staff time to come together in-house and work collaboratively on something like cross unit planning or revising rubrics for a specific department. There is a Google doc list of sessions and all staff are free to pick and choose depending on their area of interest. This is one workshop which is cross-departmental in nature.
  3. Staff Meetings– All staff are required to attend staff meetings. This is an opportunity to come together as a staff and re-group, focus on the vision/mission of the school and then to highlight what is happening in different departments as well as fun school initiatives.
  • To promote the negative practice of these principles.
  1. Complain-Sometimes when teachers come together they might start sharing their struggles and complain about the system rather than constructively working to fix it or make it better. Lepsinger (2010) says it is important to focus on what is working well.
  2. Miss meetings/pro d/ school collaboration– Some staff intentionally find reasons to avoid attending meetings and being an integral part of the system.
  3. Working solo– Some staff are like hermits. They never leave their room or their department. These teachers are not open to collaboration or working as a team and are thus a challenge to get on board.
    • To correct behaviors not conducive to your career health and the principles required to promote healthy strategic practice.
  4. Assume Value

Good communication sets the tone for whether employees will perform to their best or not. According to Lepsinger (2010) it is called a “balanced response” or a “communication tool” (p.57).

  1. Focus on What is done well

Lepsinger (2010) points out how leaders should take the time to find out what each employee does well and then set goals for them to achieve and provide coaching along the way.

  1. Praise and encourage-enhance employee self-esteem

With so many new teachers in the school system it is important to let them know they are doing a good job. Lepsinger (2010) asserts “strengthening a person’s belief in his own competence is a foundation of effective management” (p.59). It really brightens my day when I receive some positive feedback or if I someone says an encouraging word. Employee self-esteem is important to take care of and foster.

References

Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hord, S., & Roussin, J. (2013). Implementing change through learning: Concerns-based

concepts, tools and strategies for guiding change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap how great leaders and their companies get results. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.