In this precis, I describe transformational leadership (TL) approach and how it compares with servant leadership (SL). I also provide examples of real-world transformational leaders.

A key purpose of TL is to influence followers in such a manner that they accomplish far more than they would ordinarily have achieved for their organization (Northouse, 2016, p. 162). To actualize this, the leaders’ interactions should exude the following: (a) idealized influence, (b) inspirational motivation, (c) intellectual stimulation, and (d) individualized consideration (Northouse, 2016; Smith, Montagno, & Kuzmenko, 2004). With these interactions, followers become empowered; resulting in positive transformational changes (Quinn & Spreitzer, 1997).

The study by Smith et. al (2004), suggests that TL is more practicable for organizations where high skills, high performance, and innovation are a priority.

Although TL and SL approach both focus on developing followers, a key difference lies in what each one considers most important; the priority of TL is the interest of the organization while for SL, it is the personal interests of followers (Smith et. al, 2004).

An example of a real-world transformational leader was Nelson Mandela who is widely known to have positively transformed South Africa through his messages and more importantly, actions of reconciliation.

 

Refences

Northouse, P.G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and Practice. (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Quinn, R. E., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). The road to empowerment: Seven questions every leader should consider. Organizational Dynamics, 26(2), 37-49.

Smith, B.N., Montagno, R.V., & Kuzmenko, T.N. (2004). Transformational and servant leadership: Content and contextual comparisons. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 10(4), 80-91.