Category: Unit 9

https://create.twu.ca/ldrs591-sp18/#Unit_9

The most important thing for me about the conclusions section of a high-quality research report is a clear and organized summary of results and that the researcher carefully examines and relates the results to the literature. Plano-Clark and Creswell, 2015, say that the researcher should explicitly relate the results, as well as compare and contrast the results to prior research. (Plano-Clark and Creswell, 2015, P 476). By comparing the results to other, current research, this shows that the researcher is knowledgeable in the area of research. This improves the quality of the research and makes it more meaningful to the reader to know that the researcher has a strong content knowledge of other research on the topic.

This part of the conclusion is the most important for me as it allows me to have a clear understanding of the results of the research. Personally, I find other parts of a research article can be difficult to understand and at times, even confusing. Having little experience with statistics and reading data, I find it can be difficult for me. A well-written conclusion is crucial to my comprehension of the results and research. The researcher must include a description of how the results compare to predictions made by the researcher in order to provide a more clear understanding of how these results can be used for future research.

Even if the research contradicts the predictions of the researcher or the found results are unforeseen, it is important for the researcher to provide the reader with a clear and detailed explanation and relate it to the literature.

A clear and organized summary that relates the results to the literature will allow the reader to rate the importance of the research and decide whether or not the research is practical in their own practice.

If you found a research article that was significant and read to the conclusion to find that it is not clear and well written, would this impact the significance of the research? Would you still reference it?

Redirect

• Are the major results identified and summarized?

The results are identified in the Results section of the article. In the Discussion section of the article, the results are presented but they are not related to other models or descriptions of servant-leadership in the literature. Further the authors suggest: “that servant leadership can provide a successful alternative to other leadership styles…”(Melchar and Bosco, 2010, P.84). However, the question being researched was specifically about servant leadership and whether a corporate culture would develop that developed and attracted servant leaders. It was not research comparing how servant leadership style compares to other successful styles of leadership.

Rating: 1

• Are the results related to the literature?

Yes the results are related to the literature, but they are very vague. Melchar and Bosco,  (2010), state that, “We were able to empirically test the servant-leader model in three high-performing organizations whose employees are expected to perform their duties at a very high level.” (Melchar and Bosco, 2010, P 85). They do not restate their research question, hypotheses,or themes. There is no clear logical presentation of the conclusion. The authors conclude that the Servant-Leader model is effective in a for-profit organization. But since there is no clearly accepted one model of Servant-leadership, it is not clear whether they are basing their findings on the characteristics referred to in the article and put forth by Russell and Stone, 2002, and by Spears, 1995 (Melchar and Bosco, 2010, P. 76), the Greenleaf model of servant leadership introduced in 1977 (Melchar and Bosco, 2010, P.75), or the description of servant leadership put forth by Rude, 2003, in Nwogu, 2004, P. 2. One has to read the whole article, rather than just the conclusion to clearly understand what model they are using in their research.

Rating: 1

• Are appropriate implications of the results for practice identified and justified?

The authors state that their research proves that: “Clearly, servant leaders can be successful in a competitive, for-profit service organization (Melchar and Bosco, 2010, P.85)”. For-profit organizations then would be a specific audience for the research.  However, the sample size was fairly small, N=59, and the study was only conducted on 3 organizations all within the same industry. The authors admit that their results may not be generalized across all for-profit organizations. This contradicts their statement previously noted and it may have been better for the researchers to be more specific and state that: Clearly servant leaders can be successful in some competitive, for-profit service organizations.

Rating: 1

• Is there a thoughtful critique of the study’s limitations?

Yes the authors thoughtfully critique the study’s limitations, in that they admit that the sample size was small, only 3 organizations in the same industry were included in the research. In addition to the shortcomings of this research, part of the problem in studying servant leadership is that there is no one accepted model of what servant leadership is. This lack of a standard model, creates ambiguity in all of the research being conducted,as researchers are choosing different models or different criteria of servant leadership characteristics to base their research on.

Rating: 5

• Are suitable suggestions for future research provided?

The authors suggest that future research should be conducted across a broader spectrum of other for-profit organizations. They also suggest that there may be external or internal factors impacting the success of servant leadership in for-profit organizations and that there should be more empirical studies conducted. While it would no doubt be of value, studying the impact of external or internal factors impacting the success of servant leadership, as suggested by the authors, is outside of the scope of the current research that was conducted. If one is attempting to build upon the current research findings of this study, I would recommend the focus be on applying this research to a larger cross section of for-profit organizations in a variety of industries.

Rating: 1

Reference

MELCHAR, D. E., & BOSCO, S. M. (2010). Achieving High Organization Performance through Servant Leadership. Journal Of Business Inquiry: Research, Education & Application, 9(1), 74-88.

Unit 9 Learning Activities

• Does the problem focus on a real problem in practice?

The problem that the researcher plans to study is the decline in female participation in sports from middle school to high school levels. Tom tells us that there is a high amount of participation when the girls are in middle school and then as they reach high school, the level of participation is significantly low. This is a real problem in Mr. William’s practice.

• Does the researcher plan to study his or her own practices or plan to collaborate with community members?

As the physical education coordinator, participation would be something that Mr. Williams values. He plans to study the reason for lack of participation from females and hopes to learn what he can change within his own practice. In his review, Mr. Williams suggests that if some of the necessary changes are low cost, he will implement them immediately. The students who will participate in the surverys are the community members that he will survey. I would be interested in also knowing results of a survey done on parents of participants and teachers of the participants involved.

• Does the project include careful reflection about the problem?

Because I am female, I feel as though I have a slightly different reflection on this. I was one of those students who participated in all sports in middle school and almost none in high school. There were several reasons for this. 1. I think that girls have an extreme fear of acceptance. In my own case, I was never that good at sports, naturally my participation dwindled as I always felt like I was a ‘benchwarmer’ and it became a waste of my time. In middle school, it wasn’t a big deal, but in high school, girls are more concerned about what other people think. Also, sports become more competitive and serious in high school and some people don’t enjoy that aspect of it. 2. High school was a lot more about academics than middle school. 3. My family encouraged me to work throughout high school and sports take a lot of time and dedication.

I have coached basketball for 4 seasons. I know that committing to sports takes a lot of time and dedication. It makes sense to me that the level of participation is lower in high school as people are trying to establish themselves and work a little bit in order to start learning to be more self-sufficient.

I believe that the data collected in this research will cover all of the above pieces of reflection.

• Does the researcher plan to gather several sources of information (e.g. quantitative and qualitative procedures)?

Mr. Williams, plans to begin his research with data that is already available within the school including numbers of participants. Next, he will conduct a literature search on female participation trends in sports. He will then use a mixed method sequential approach. I believe this is an appropriate method of research for this problem. The quantitative results in this research are necessary in order to provide a general idea and explanation of numbers of participants. The qualitative data, which will be collected from focus groups made up of 6-8 kids, will provide a deeper understanding of why the problem exists and will build on the quantitative results. Mr. William’s will incorporate a Likert scale to learn about opinions on participation. After this data is collected, he will take on a quantitative research approach, using a focus group setting which will allow participants to openly discuss and suggest solutions to the problem. When all of the data is gathered, Mr. Williams will analyze the data and look for patterns. At this point, he will analyze his own practices to see what can be changed. Mr. Williams will monitor and ensure that the participation levels increase and that the changes he has implemented are working.

• Does the researcher develop a clear plan for addressing the problem?

The researcher develops and explains his plan for gathering and acting on the information. His plan is clear, concise and contains enough details in order for someone to have a clear and proficient understanding of the plan.

• Does the project include reflecting, thinking, looking, and gathering information and acting?

Yes, the researcher includes reflecting, thinking, looking and gathering information and acting upon it. He plans to gather significant amounts of data from various sources and provides a clear plan for analyzing the results and making a plan for implementing change.

• Will the results of the procedure enhance the lives of those involved?

The results have potential to enhance the lives of those involved. If the girls really enjoy the sports and aren’t participating because of variables beyond their control, such as part time jobs or academics, then the chance to participate will enhance their lives. I

If the girls just simply don’t enjoy the sports that are offered and they continue to not want to participate, their lives will not be enhanced.