Journey of Self Discovery

Category: LDRS591 (Page 3 of 3)

Defining Research Interest – Unit 2

Part A – My Experience Searching for Scholarly Literature

www.canstockphoto.ca

I experienced a plethora of emotions as I searched for scholarly literature that would allow me to delve deeper into some of the areas that I am passionate about pursuing. I started off very excited and pleased with a question I had formed on my concept map. I’d like to be able to say that I joyfully searched and was immediately rewarded for my efforts, however, this wasn’t the case at all. I began to feel woefully inadequate as I turned up empty handed over and over again.  I kept going back to the drawing board and my concept map and starting a different question from scratch. Sometimes there simply wasn’t enough information available on the areas that appealed to me the most. As the week wore on, I began to become really concerned that I wasn’t going to be able to find a research problem.  I needed to find a question that not only appealed to me, and, presented a relevant issue that needed further investigation but also one that would provide sufficient information and data. With great relief (probably to my family as well), I finally settled on a topic! In the end, the databases that proved to be the most helpful in my search for the most recent scholarly articles were the ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center), EBSCO and Google Scholar.

Part B – Assessment of a Source

Source:  Link To Journal Article: How Can Schools Support Beginning Teachers? A call for Timely Induction and Mentoring for Effective Teaching

Author: Peter Hudson

Author’s Credentials:  Peter Hudson is the author and contributor to 150 referred conference papers and journal articles.  He is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Education at Queensland University of Technology.  In addition to being an Associate Professor for 20 years, he has had 16 years educational experience as a teacher and as a Principal. His University research focus is on mentoring early-career teachers. He won a National Program Award from the Office of Learning and Teaching in 2013 and a National Citation Award in 2012 for his work on the Mentoring for Effective Teaching (MET) program. (Link to Credential Information)

Currency: The source was published on July 6, 2012 in the Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Being less than 10 years old, it is relevant and up to date. The author also included 47 references in his 14 page study.

Purpose: The intentions of the author are to raise awareness about the growing need for new teachers to receive support with teaching practices, with pedagogical knowledge development and behaviour management. The intended audience for this article are school districts, school administrators, experienced educators and new teachers.

Publication Type/Process: This article was peer reviewed and published in 2012 by Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37 (7), pp.70-84. The article ISSN number is 0313-5373.

Bias/Special Interests: The article is a qualitative study involving a small number of the author’s students who are part of the MET program which the  author was an active participant in developing. The author notes that the “study was limited with the number of participants and the geographic location, therefore it may be difficult to make generalizations beyond these immediate contexts” (Hudson, 2012, p.83). The author also admits that, “more research is needed on understanding how mentoring beginning teachers affects teaching practice and student achievement using a range of data sources” (Hudson, 2012, p.83).

Part C – The Sources I will Use and Trust The Most

www.henrykotula.com

As outlined by Clark & Creswell (2015, pp 132-133), I will be selecting literature that is relevant and of good quality by looking at whether the source is an original source, if it’s been peer-reviewed and if it can be accessed through mostly reputable databases like ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center), EBSCO Google Scholar and TWU’s library. For literature on quantitative research studies I will refer to Clark & Creswell’s (2015, p.211) chart outlining the criteria and indicators for evaluation and likewise to their chart on page 301 outlining the criteria for evaluating qualitative research reports.  In addition to books and peer reviewed articles,  when listening to TED Talks, watching news reports, youtube videos, or reading blogs, I will be:

  • examining the credentials and experience of the speaker
  • looking for evidence of bias
  • questioning the intent and purpose
  • looking for how current the report is
  • looking for the number of references cited to review the accuracy of data reported

A Discussion Question:

How does a study gain credibility if it is the first of its kind without  prior existing data to reference or build from?

 

References

Badke, W. (2017). Finding your way through the information fog (6th ed.). Bloomington, IN:iUniverse

Booth, W. C., Columbia, G.G. & Williams, J.M. (2008). The Craft of Research (3rd ed.) Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, p. 51-65

Hudson, P. (2012). How Can Schools Support Beginning Teachers? A Call for Timely Induction and Mentoring for Effective Teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education37(7). Retrieved from https://ezproxy.student.twu.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ995200&site=eds-live

Plano-Clark, V. & Creswell, J. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. (2nd Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

 

 

 

Scholarly Inquiry Introduction – Unit 1

Part 1: Introduction, Informal & Formal Research

Hi everyone!  My name is Lara and I’m the very proud mom of two kids, ages 17 and 20. Professionally,  I’m an educator in the lower mainland and love what I get to do for a living.  You might assume based upon my profession that I am very familiar with formal research.  However,  I actually don’t know a lot about it and don’t really know how to read/interpret/write a research article other than what I learned a looooong time ago.  I’m excited to dust off the learning cobwebs and get started!

Informal & Formal Research

Informal research is what we do everyday without even thinking about it. As a teacher, I take daily polls of my students by asking them questions which aids in formative learning assessments. I watch my students conduct informal research while they experiment with challenges in class, as they try out various possibilities until they find a solution that works for them.  We constantly gather data in our everyday lives, we just don’t necessarily analyze it or question it further or report out on it.

Image: www.kqed.org

Formal scholarly inquiry research according to Clark and Creswell (2015),  involves asking a question, collecting data and analyzing the data in order to answer the question that was posed. Formal scholarly inquiry findings can be found shared in books, journal articles that have been peer reviewed for authenticity and in early stage materials such as conference papers, theses and papers posted on websites (Clark & Creswell, 2015).

 

Part 2: Leadership Factors, Decisions & Scholarly Inquiry

www.shutterstock.com

As the Department Head within my school community, one of my responsibilities is to help prepare the roll-out of Career Education for all Grade 9 students. It is a difficult and challenging task as the curriculum is to be embedded within regular classrooms without a set assigned teacher.  My position was built to coincide with the implementation of brand new curriculum.  In order to help assist with this transition period, a decision I made was to prepare a 3 year Career Education Action Plan for our school by enlisting help and input from members of our team.

Some of the factors that shape my decision making process as the Career Education Department Head at my school are:

  • First and foremost, asking the question “Is this what’s best for kids or a particular student?”
  • What curricular goals are we trying to meet and implement?
  • Will this decision enable us to continue to build and grow a sustainable culture within the school?
  • Will this be engaging and inspiring for our students and staff?
  • Would I want to do this? If not, how can I expect someone else to?
  • How will this be authentically assessed?

Image: Can Stock Photo

Scholarly inquiry applies to everyday decision making, especially in the field of education. We live in an age where students (and most adults) just automatically turn to google to look for answers to what they want to know. Unfortunately, in the midst of this process, they sometimes take at face value the first thing that pops up believing it to be factual without questioning the source’s authenticity or the possible bias of data presented. I try to teach my students the importance of asking essential questions and of digging deep to get the answers that they seek.  As an educator, I continually seek ways that will aid me in improving my teaching methods and practices by reading books, watching TED talks and attending professional development workshops. I especially love to listen to people’s stories and learn from their shared experiences. A story teller in particular that I love to learn from is Brene Brown.  Any information gathered that has proven to be successful in my classroom, I continually share through school district workshops, in department and whole school meetings and via my professional development network on social media like Twitter as well as through peer mentoring of new teachers.

Part 3: Evidence Based Decisions 

I was initially shocked to discover that according to Pfeffer and Sutton (2006) only about 15% of doctors base their decisions on evidence, relying instead on “obsolete knowledge gained in school, long standing but never proven traditions, patterns gleaned from experience, the methods they believe in and are most skilled at applying, and information from hordes of vendors with products and services to sell” (Pfeffer & Sutton, 2006, p.1).  Upon further reflection, I realized that many educators (myself included) are at times guilty of the exact same decision making practices.  It isn’t that there isn’t enough information out there, it’s that there is so much of it, it’s hard to wade through what is reliable and specifically applicable to any particular situation. Pfeffer and Sutton (2006) make an excellent point when they refer to decisions being driven by “dogma and belief”  and as “people are overly influenced by ideology, they often fail to question whether a practice will work because it fits so well with what they know” (Pfeffer & Sutton, 2006, p.3). According to Trybus (2007), “a balance needs to be struck between professional wisdom and empirical evidence” and that it is “only through application and utilization of research balanced with professional wisdom that sound decision making can occur” (Trybus, 2007, p. 8).  In order to make evidence based decisions,  it is important to ask the questions “Why does a given practice enhance performance?” and “What is the logic that links it to bottom-line results (Pfeffer and Sutton, 2006, p.6)?”

As leaders, evidence based decision making is important because it

Google Images: www.sgrainbow.asia

enables you to evolve as a team and sustain growth as an organization.  By demonstrating and committing to  a growth mindset you build confidence and gain trust amongst the team players.  Pfeffer and Sutton (2006) state that as leaders the most important thing is to be willing to admit what you don’t know. By involving the team in the decision making process, you create a new cultural norm, as most sustainable decisions require everyone’s commitment and ownership buy in to be successful.  As an educational leader and a classroom teacher, I concur with Trybus (2007) when she states “decision makers cannot assume that teachers will be committed to a decision regardless of how it came about unless they are part of the process associated with reaching that decision (Trybus, 2007, p.8)”.  Evidence based decision making is essential in schools so that educators will continually be challenged to do what is best for kids.

A parting question for you…

As a leader within your organization, do you find it difficult to challenge past practices that team members continue to use that are no longer justifiable? How do you initiate integrating evidence based changes? What research sources do you use most frequently to build your knowledge base?

 

Resources

Pfeffer, J. & Sutton R. I. (2006). Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2006/01/evidence-based-management.

Plano-Clark, V. & Creswell, J. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. (2nd Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Trybus, M. (2007). Understanding scientifically based research: A mandate or decision making tool? Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 73(4), 5-8.

 

 

Newer posts »

© 2026 A Walk in the Woods

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑