Response to SeaBreeze’s Strategic Competencies at Work

ET1-MSSL, Health & Education, ldrs501, Post 8.1
\

Original post found here: https://create.twu.ca/seabreeze/2018/11/21/blog-8-1-strategic-competencies-at-work/

Thank you, Seabreeze, for once again posting a detailed description of strategic leadership in an educational setting with all the tangents that are required in a public school.  You have revealed many of the everyday realities we teachers face as we try to deliver and education that prepares students for their opportunity to participate in the world beyond school campuses.

Competencies

Strategic Planning is a definite necessity moving forward in my career also as you mentioned it will be incorporated into your teaching (Seabreeze, 2018, para. 2).  As I read the various texts and tried to apply the information to our academic setting, I realized I have had this mini strategic plan for my own career.  Moving from my former district was difficult because I knew administrators would provide opportunities for me to pursue my goals; they cared about my career, how I was doing personally, and met with me regularly to help me continue to grow as an educator. As an overall district strategy, I can see now that they “hire[d] for fit, train[ed] for skills” (Galbraith, 2014, 54). Transferring to new district involved an entirely new strategic plan because as one thoughtful administrator told me, “We don’t know you, so we don’t owe you.”  This caused me to re-evaluate my approach and learn more about my contract, my union, the district and its practices, and lately, our pension.  Armed with this newly acquired understanding of my profession, I now invest and educate my colleagues who may not understand the cost of being a union member or the protocols of the district.  Teachers may be part of an organization, but they are also creators of their own career strategy. “Crafting strategy is more of a discovery process than it is a determination process or a process of choosing among a limited set of possibilities” (Hughes, Beatty, & Dinwoodie, 2014, p. 28).

Image result for images for vision

Your second competency revolved around your commitment to employ vision throughout your career.  As Lepsinger (2010) promotes, vision is the connection between strategy and action (p. 35).  While I know I am not a visionary (Ungerer et al. 2016, p. 91) nor do I have a greater vision than my colleagues for where my school might need some strategic planning for effectiveness, I am never shy of ideas to try that seem to fit the needs.  I have come to realize that crafting a vision can be learned and is very necessary to develop purpose, direction, and culture within a school. Ungerer, Ungerer, & Herholdt contend that vision clarifies priorities (2016, p. 63).  This kind of vision is possible for me.

My idea of vision is always rooted in my values and your third competency speaks to that as well (SeaBreeze, 2018, para. 4).  Consistent in practice and in faith is a necessity for me as I teach in the public system.  This requires vigilance to one’s own practice as well as to the external factors that can create tension between vision and reality (Ungerer et al., 2016, p. 63).  I appreciated your reminder of Ungerer et al.’s description to virtuous leadership and the requirement that leadership maintain a strong moral base (2016, pp. 41-42).  Although leading in a virtuous way does not guarantee more success, it must certainly mitigate the gap between plans and action while ensuring each decision is in balance with personal values and organizational vision.  I take encouragement from Lepsinger’s acknowledgment that “it’s reassuring to know that no matter what your current capability, with practice you can reach a high level of competence (2010, p. 208).

How do you see your career changing with your commitment to strategic planning, applying vision, and filtering decisions through your values in the public system?  What benefits or drawbacks do you expect to experience using your strategic competencies even though your organization may not adhere to the same focus of strategic thinking?

References

Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hughes, R., Beatty, K. & Dinwoodie, D. (2014). Becoming a strategic leader: Your role in your organization’s enduring success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap: How great leaders and their companies get results. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

SeaBreeze. (November 20, 2018). Blog 8.1: strategic competencies at work. Retrieved from https://create.twu.ca/seabreeze/2018/11/21/blog-8-1-strategic-competencies-at-work/

Response to Cooperation in a National Company of China: Seems Effective, yet Conflicts Lie Underneath

ET1-MSSL, Health & Education, health and education, ldrs501, Post 7.1
\

Read the original post from Layla here:  https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/2018/11/12/cooperation-in-a-national-company-of-china-seems-effective-yet-conflicts-lie-underneath/

Reading through your post, Layla, I was struck by how easy it would be to confuse compliance with cooperation.  State Grid sounds like a large company with many departments who need to coordinate with each other.  Your role in training and educating employees must be critical to ensuring alignment with the company’s MVV.  When you mention that you must include the Communist ideal of “working for the collective goals, yielding in conflicts, and teamwork” (Zhang, 2018, para. 2), I wondered how closely that aligns with strategic teams where “trust and strong relationships must also exist between the team and other key teams in the organization” (Hughes et al., 2014, p. 210)?  Is this more of an ideology of obedience for greater uniformity or are these ideals to truly have employees at all levels think in alignment with the MVV and thus produce more innovative and creative solutions to the company’s issues?

It is difficult for me to grasp the day-to-day functioning in a business world since I have been in the classroom several decades.  Systems of rewards for quality work and company allegiance do not exist in my workplace.  Years ago I discovered the odd truth in education that those who need little assistance and are hard-working, innovative thinkers usually get more work and more challenging classes; teachers who are less efficient, take all their sick days, or lament a great deal tend to receive more assistance or grace:  “those who do, do more and those who don’t, get help” seems to be the mantra.  I do not think this model would work well in your company or in many businesses, do you?

Integrity.  You mentioned integrity is a core value for your company (Zhang, 2018, para. 1).  Who is to show integrity and how is this core value modelled by the leaders?  “Leading with integrity is one of the great challenges of leadership” (Suggs, 2012, para. 1).  Since leading with integrity means to lead completely (Sugg, para. 4) and TSL leaders seek to build up their followers, leaders with integrity should put others first.  Is this exemplified in the leaders of your company?  Galbraith (2014) discusses that training in an organization needs to be continuous and targeted at cross-unit participants because it builds relationships which adds to the network (p. 145). Do you also train leaders, Layla, or do you train staff according to the changing needs of the organization and the vision of its leaders?

At the end of your post you discuss some of the conflicts that occur in your company more frequently at the lower level, and, to female workers.  The inability for their voices to be heard by leaders at higher levels must create inequities among employees.  How can this be addressed in your company?  Is this a problem for which people are seeking a solution or is this just an inevitable condition of a large company?  Hughes et al. say that often “too little attention is paid to the human element of strategy” and yet “organizations need to be as intentional about leadership strategy as they are about business strategy” (2014, p. 12).  Is the company growing in its awareness of the human emotions, needs, and beliefs that can impact their efficiency in maintaining alignment with their core values?

References

Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hughes, R., Beatty, K. & Dinwoodie, D. (2014). Becoming a strategic leader: Your role in your organization’s enduring success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Suggs, D. (2012) Leading with integrity. Retrieved from http://www.delsuggs.com/articles/Leading%20with%20Integrity.pdf

Zhang, L. (2018). Cooperation in a national company of china: Seems effective, yet conflicts lie underneath [Blog Post].  Retrieved from https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/2018/11/12/cooperation-in-a-national-company-of-china-seems-effective-yet-conflicts-lie-underneath/

Response to Tegelberg’s Conflict and Cooperation Post 7.1

ET1-MSSL, health and education, ldrs501, Post 7.1, response post
\

The original post which precipitated this response can be found at this link: https://create.twu.ca/robtegelberg/2018/11/12/post-7-1-conflict-and-cooperation/

Your post, Rob, was delightful yet difficult for me to read: delightful due to the revelation that a positive and supportive workplace exists in education; difficult because it widens the gap between the reality of my current work environment and the way it could be.  It is fascinating to know that a Christian school can bring so many faiths together (Tegelberg, 2018, line10) and create a supportive environment for staff and students alike!  “This is evident when listening to staff conversations, or interactions between staff and students” (Tegelberg, 2018, line 14). Bridge Builder 2 in Closing the Execution Gap promotes the idea of assuming value in people while we expect top performance from them in the areas of their strengths.  By focusing on what staff—and perhaps even students—do well, everyone’s self-esteem is bolstered to where they are all willing to put in more effort (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 72).

I was intrigued with your statement, “They use professional development as a tool to grow the various skills of the staff members to create a more diverse and well rounded team” (Tegelberg, 2018, para. 3).  Do you think there is an optimal amount of diversity before there is noticeable divergence from the MVV of your school (Galbraith, 2014, p. 238)? Public school teachers are always participating in professional development (pro-d) with five designated pro-d days each school year. We also have locally offered workshops after school to promote programs and resources that are District-approved.  Every second month we have a two-hour session with our own staff called After-School Collaboration which should be to create unified skill development on staff chosen by us. My school usually goes in a direction determined by our principal. Although it is important for everyone to learn new functional skills and processes (Galbraith, 2014, p.145), the relationships we need to build to work more cohesively would be a better focus for our staff at this point.

Addressing Some of the Discussion Questions

  1. Beginning conflict resolution with prayer is not your every day practice in public schools even when there are many Christian teachers. We do have conversations and support each other through prayer and check-ins. Many of my administrators over the years have been Christians which is evident in how they interact with staff, how they plan for the growth and development of the school, and how they deal with recalcitrant students.

Image result for prayer images (Udodiong, 2018)

“Look to the Lord and his strength; seek His face always” – 1 Chronicles 16:11

The last time I prayed together with staff at a school was about 6 years ago. Most of the intermediate staff (9 teachers) were Christians so we tried to meet every 2nd week after school to talk and pray together. The principal saw us meeting one day and asked us why we were meeting.  She must have been insecure because the next time the teachers were at intermediate collaboration, she was antagonistic, negative, and yelled at them for not being supportive and encouraging with the rest of the staff.  In the Spring when jobs were posted for this school, she did not even interview me for the position I had held all year on a temporary contract, a prime example of relative power being applied to direct the outcomes (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 197).  It was after this experience that the District relocated me year-after-year to various high-needs schools. This way of teaching was in stark contrast to all my previous 20 years of teaching which made it difficult to keep a positive attitude in the changing circumstances.

At my current school, conflict resolution protocols would be helpful.  Divisions occur when people speak their minds at staff meetings as well as call out others openly under the guise of humour.  Treating each other respectfully seems challenging at this school and yet everyone can work together to achieve larger projects.  Hearing words of encouragement, support, or affirmations is rarer than it should be in a place where we are educating children to be caring, productive, solution-oriented members of society.  “The primary goal of Social Studies education is to give students the knowledge, skills, and competencies to be active, informed citizens who are able to think critically, understand and explain the perspectives of others, make judgments, and communicate ideas effectively” (BC, 2018, para. 1).

  1. Dealing with negative school culture, gossip, and grumbling is challenging when the root is unknown. Since there are several staff members at my current school who have worked in this one location for over 10 years and I am just in my 4th year, the actual development of some of the isolated styles of teaching are a mystery. However, in my short time there, the climate is continuing to deteriorate without a seeming awareness or effort to stem the decline.  “One of the most important elements of leadership strategy pertains to the desired culture in an organization, and that translates in an SLT to examining the influence processes within the team itself” (Hughes et al., 2014, p. 209).  Rapid growth and a significant increase in severe behaviour students in every classroom is adding to the stress and feelings of defeat. I am not confident I am making changes in my work place, but I do try to stop in on one or more colleagues each day to see how they are doing.  It changes my mindset and fosters a small sense of relationship built through trust (Bass & Riggio, 2006, p. 53).  Since my classroom is a in a portable this year, I must make an extra effort to connect with staff inside the school since they will not be swinging past my class to have chats.  Supporting, encouraging, and assisting my colleagues is part of my planned legacy at this point in my career; I don’t get to see the day-to-day functioning of the rest of the school, but I am also not caught up in all the drama.

References

Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

BC Curriculum, (2018).  Core competencies: Introduction to social studies.  Retrieved from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/social-studies/core/introduction

Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hughes, R., Beatty, K. & Dinwoodie, D. (2014). Becoming a strategic leader: Your role in your organization’s enduring success (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap: How great leaders and their companies get results. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Tegelberg, R. (2018). Conflict and Cooperation. [Blog Post] Retrieved from https://create.twu.ca/robtegelberg/2018/11/12/post-7-1-conflict-and-cooperation/

Udodiong, I. (February 25, 2018) Prayer: 5 bible verses that prove that praying is truly the key. Retrieved from https://www.pulse.ng/communities/religion/5-bible-verses-that-prove-that-prayer-is-truly-the-key-id8035248.html

Response to HC1 Leader Post 7.1

ET1-MSSL, health and education, ldrs501, Post 7.1, response post
\

Enjoy reading the original post from Jessica Sawatzky here: https://create.twu.ca/jessicalaugsawatzky/2018/11/12/hc-1-leader-post-7-1/

Internet of Things: The Digital Future of Value-based Care

(Retrieved from https://hitconsultant.net/2017/11/03/internet-things-digital-future-value-based-care/)

The description you provide of your work environment in your Week 7 post on Conflict and Cooperation creates a mental image of a smoothly operating work place, Jessica.  You mention the earlier friction while developing the mission, vision, and values but since that was before your arrival, you have no experience with that conflict. I appreciate your mention of the time it takes to allow the MVV become part of everyone’s daily practice (Sawatzky, 2018, para. 1).  In all our readings, discussion posts, and assignments, we present the MVV as able to cure many workplace issues and miraculously bring unanimous alignment among staff members. I have not found it to be this way; people still need to make the decisions to follow the principles of the MVV and make choices in line with the organizational policies. “SLTs generally can only be as strategically effective as the organization’s overall strategy itself is both well reasoned and clear” (Hughes, Beatty, & Dinwoodie, 2014, p. 208).

What happens when there are disagreements in your workplace?  Lepsinger (2010) says that “despite having shared goals in place, the people you depend on to get things done often have different perspectives” (p. 180).  You mention your department has “been very transparent in their attempts to enhance the corporate working environment” (Sawatzky, 2018, para. 3) but when there are differing opinions, does seniority play a part in resolving differing perspectives?  Working in a union environment always adds another layer of protocols and ethics to follow.  From your description, it does seem like your leadership is assuming value in all employees and providing balanced responses to potential issues (Hughes et al., 2014, p. 57).

When discussing synergy being the result of good decision-making, Galbraith acknowledges that “the challenge for the solution provider is to get all of its business units to work together” (2014, p. 266).  You shared a situation of conflict between two departments which was noticeably time consuming and your “productivity took a nosedive during that time” (Sawatzky, 2018, para. 5).  Is there another method you have learned through strategic leadership thinking and acting which may have resolved the interdepartmental issues in a more efficient manner?

You mention you are a visionary, Jessica and are working on developing your ability to deal with smaller details.  Hughes et al. discuss the need to focus on what employees do well and help them improve in areas where they may struggle (2014, p. 58).  How do you apply this to your employees?  Are you better able to see where some of your struggling colleagues and employees have strengths and then develop a plan for them to increase their skillset in a broader way?

Thank you, Jessica, for revealing some of the strategic problem solving and conflict resolution practices of your organization!

References

Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hughes, R., Beatty, K. & Dinwoodie, D. (2014). Becoming a strategic leader: Your role in your organization’s enduring success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap: How great leaders and their companies get results. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Sawatzky, J. (2018).  HC 1 leader post 7.1. [Blog Post] Retrieved November 13, 2018 from https://create.twu.ca/jessicalaugsawatzky/2018/11/12/hc-1-leader-post-7-1/

The Q-Sort and Educational Values

ET1-MSSL, health and education, ldrs501, Post 4.4
\

Educational Values

The Q Sort framework (Atha, 2018, para. 13) was an interesting little exercise that provided some animated conversations!  The selected participants included myself, two colleagues not at my current school and two people who are not involved in the education system.  Each participant group included one female and one male participant to ensure multiple perspectives were represented.

Same/Different

For all the participants who completed the Q-Sort Score Sheet, developing intellectual potential came out as the most important educational value for public schools.  This seems an obvious choice given that the focus is education.  I did expect a difference on this most important category given that there is so much media focus on what the school system is not doing to prepare students for real things in life.  Education is a head-and-heart business where people understand that learning is a mental task but want their child treated with a heart approach—tough to balance, at times, knowing that children must be brought into that uncomfortable zone where learning happens.

After this first category, every other element was slightly different.  The women favoured the areas of developing character such as developing student emotional stability (8), developing positive social relationships (6), and cooperating through teamwork (4).  The male perspective promoted competing with others (1) over cooperation (4) and preparing career skills (9) over emotional stability (8).  This seems to fit with how male teachers approach the job of teaching vs. how female teachers nurture their students in the classroom.

Agree/Differ

Since we all agreed that public schools should focus on developing intellectual potential as the priority of their mandate, it seems obvious that the rest of the items were ordered according to out value systems.  Valuing competition (1) reduces the likelihood of cooperation, teamwork, social relationships being as important as individual development (5).  Debating these elements was helpful in that the logic and rationalization for individual preferences seemed to stem from their personal experiences as well as their current professional pedagogical perspectives.

The male participant not in education had a sales background in big business; this environment apparently fosters a lot of competition and individual development to stand out and receive bonuses as well as promotions.  Business is not the same as the inner structures of education.  All the teachers put emotional stability of students (8) as Middle or Next Most Important; it is a very relevant and highly prioritized part of our every day practice since the number of students diagnosed with anxiety disorders and irrational behaviour at school is on the rise.

Values, Views, and Visions

Discussing educational ideals with colleagues is very different than discussing education emphases with non-teaching participants. All the females who completed the Q-Sort were mothers which seemed to focus their answers toward the more relational aspects of the sort (4, 6, 8) as well as the element of ensuring a well-organized, orderly environment (7).  This appears logical and ordinary to me since we have all spent time teaching children how to get along with others as a necessary life and job character trait.  Competing with others (1) was low for the women and significantly higher for the men.  Politically correct statements were made in relation to the goals for girls and boys regarding education and how those goals would drive decisions parents and schools make within BC’s public schools.  Education seems to be both a personal and political venue at the same time.

While all the participants spoke to the value of education, each participant had various reactions to the effectiveness of public education in its current focus and differed greatly in the middle to least important range.  These differences led to discussions about what needs to change in the public-school education approach and why many people choose private or independent education for their children.  Since none of the participants who agreed to participate in my Q-Sort request had attended independent schools nor chose to send their children to tuition-required schools, it is an element that would be considered in this Q-Sort.  Would independent school participants provide different answers or sort the elements of this Q-Sort differently?

Proviso: I am the only one who had selected a private school for their child even though I am a public-school teacher. When I moved to the Fraser Valley from my small northern town, my daughter and I chose a private school for her to complete her Grade 11 and 12 years.  This seemed prudent with all the enormous changes I was requiring of her when we moved just after she turned 16.

References

Atha, D. (2018).  Organizational information strategies. [Course Notes] Retrieved October 31, 2018 from https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/week-4-post-4-4/

Place-Based Observations (Subjectivity and Intuition – 4.3)

ET1-MSSL, health and education, ldrs501, Post 4.3
\

Political Undercurrents

Political undercurrents are always part of education.   We are governed by the Ministry of Education and the British Columbia Teachers’ Union (BCTF).  The political nature of education filters in to site specific decisions for daily functioning so we are always made aware of the impact of local decisions.  Administrators have their own career goals which can determine how they lead a specific school.  Keeping parents on side is a political move which often relegates the teacher to following the dictates of decisions made with little consultation. Many educational decisions are made in the public eye through the media which results in teachers being treated as a general collective—if one does it, we are all guilty of the same behaviour.

Each school has a specific climate and public image.  Since this often reflects on the leadership at a school, principals often make decisions to foster the image they wish to project to the parent community.  Employees must, therefore, participate in activities and events that support that image which is often beyond the classroom and beyond regular work hours.  Schools have become micro-communities with multi-facetted commitments which require staff involvement without compensation.  The political need for public support leads to political decisions which do not always benefit the staff.

Power Plays

Some leaders I have worked with have the personality trait of needing to be the ones who make all the “good” decisions.  I have had some administrators that very boldly state that their way is the right way; others merely point out the flaws and weaknesses of proposals put forth by employees. Strong leaders should build up their employees and create opportunities for the employee to shine. Teachers will do a better job in the classroom—the job they are hired to do—when they are encouraged, supported, and entrusted to make sound educational decisions.  Administrators who seek personal glory cannot afford to inform their staff, share data, and let others learn to lead.

Protecting Trust

Consistent decision making for the good of all can lead to a trust relationship between administrators and their staff. Schools are often in the spotlight and do need management for consistent progress.  Since everyone bears the responsibility for building the school community, everyone must be trusted to do their part. Our personality traits will weave themselves into every area of our lives including our leadership; knowing ourselves is as important as knowing those whom we are leading. When the trust relationship is strong between leader and followers, everyone can work together as a team.

Positive Approaches

Many meetings at school are long dispensations of information where the staff receive the information and the administrator delivers.  The meetings are led by administrators, the topics are primarily selected by administrators, and the outcomes are gently (or sometimes firmly) controlled by administrators.  While there may be a few minutes left at the end of a meeting for topics or issues raised by staff members, these items seem so unimportant at the end of a meeting that there is usually very little discussion and no real buy-in for change.   Since trusting employees seems difficult for some administrators, employees are often treated as incapable, unreliable, and short-sighted in considering what is truly beneficial for their school environment.

Practical Observations

Some administrators seldom to get to all the classrooms in a school and certainly do not have time for personal conversations with employees unless initiated by the administrator.  How can their observations be accurate?  How can their objectives meet the needs of teaching staff if they do not ask?  Having been moved from school-to-school for the better part of 10 years in one of my districts, I have had the privilege of working under many different styles of leadership.  Since I was often a temporary staff member (one-year contracts), administrators did not spend a lot of time checking in on me or investing in me.  As one administrator told me when I asked to have an evaluation done for my classroom practice, “We focus on the staff that actually works here.”  Building up people on a staff should include all staff members.  It seems that a lot of information could be delivered via e-mail, power point, or perhaps a podcast with a short Kahoot to ensure some comprehension.  Perhaps then our meetings could include important matters that pertain to our day-to-day survival in the trenches.

All for One but not One for All (Post 4.2)

ET1-MSSL, health and education, ldrs501, Post 4.2
\

Collective Decision-making from Different Perspectives

Differing Thinkers in a Familiar Organization

AA – Deductive Thinker

  • Adamant about strategies that are relevant
  • Is not easily swayed to other points of view
  • Will pursue own goals relentlessly
  • Disengages when needing to involve others or compromise
  • Talks a lot about own ideas

AB – Deductive Thinker

  • Logical thinker and follows simple plans
  • Does not get emotionally involved in assisting students
  • Wants a clear plan to most actions
  • Will pursue own goals passionately
  • Points out flaws in the contributions of others

AC – Deductive Thinker

  • Silent but not easily drawn into plans from others
  • Clearly states limits of personal contributions
  • Allocates/delegates but claims own tasks first
  • Minimalist in contributions throughout school
  • Keeps records to remind others of who has done what

AD – Inductive Thinker

  • Thinks about how others are feeling
  • Helping others in various areas around the school
  • Quiet in meetings but politely answers when asked
  • Problem solves in less conventional ways for students

Appreciating Differences through Collaboration

Deductive thinkers begin with an hypothesis and then conducts research to prove the accuracy of this theory. “Deductive reasoning is more narrow and is generally used to test or confirm hypotheses” (Crossman, 2018, para. 8).  For colleagues who are take a more deductive approach, the following list contains some suggestions for working more considerately with their dominant tendencies toward deductive thinking:

  • Present a linear plan that can connect the dots logically and externally (belief proves outcomes).
  • Base decisions on facts that are data-driven since change comes from beliefs but require options for flexibility.
  • Buy-in will increase involvement which will help to achieve results or drive change (belief proves outcomes).
  • Assign the data/logical/linear portions to deductive thinkers to satisfy their need to see the possibility of the results they want.
  • Increase their capacity to see the details of inductive thinkers by facilitating collaboration and requiring compromise where possible/necessary.
  • Keep in mind the MVV of the organization so decisions and selected solutions support the goals.

Inductive thinkers gather and analyze data first then follow through to the theory.  “By nature, inductive reasoning is more open-ended and exploratory, especially during the early stages.” (Crossman, 2018, para. 8).

  • Draw out their observational data to include in planning (Crossman, 2018, para. 1).
  • Take more time to discuss information that may impact data-based decisions.
  • Increase the validity of observational contributions to embed flexibility for decisions that involve people, especially developing students.
  • Include more data-driven decision-making opportunities when trying to develop the big picture for the organization and ensuing decisions.
  • Remind inductive thinkers to consider the MVV of the organization.

Changing Interactions to Increase Collaborative Productivity

  • Consider their perspective and dominant working style when conversing or requesting
  • Get to know them personally to understand the factors impinging on their lives outside of work.
  • Ask for contributions—always be part of the conversation.
  • Create multi-facetted teams (inductive and deductive together) to broaden perspectives and think more inclusively. Both inductive and deductive thinkers require facts and use logic and should somehow be able to meet in the middle
  • Remind all participants that these are the students in our classrooms.
    1. Walk & talk should match; we must practice what we preach.
    2. Listen more; hear what is being said.
    3. Wait before responding.
    4. Can you work in this plan/program/project?

Since we all work in schools, we are part of a large on-going social process in which both theory and research play a part in daily decisions.  Whether we are deductive (top-down) or inductive (bottom-up), both are needed to create a learning environment that will meet the d=needs of diverse learners.  “Most social research, however, involves both inductive and deductive reasoning throughout the research process (Farnam, 2018, para. 8).

Schools need flexibility and adaptability because they are focused on developing people.  Decisions, however, must be based on data to maintain integrity, coherence, and more predictable growth patterns.  Logical decisions based on data for site-specific situations require leadership accountability. “To lead is to recognize the level or accountability and responsibility for the position and process” (Atha, 2018, para. 2).  Humility is necessary for both perspectives and to make decisions from each perspective.

Questions

Are inductive thinkers more introverted people with deductive thinkers more extroverted?

Do deductive thinkers work together with greater unity due to reliance on belief for proving outcomes?

References

Atha, D. (2018).  Seeing things the way God sees them. Retrieved October 29, 2018 from https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/week-4-post-4-2/

Crossman, A. (July 23, 2018) Deductive vs inductive reasoning: Two different approaches to scientific research. Retrieved October 30, 2018 from https://www.thoughtco.com/deductive-vs-inductive-reasoning-3026549

Farnam Street. (2018). Deductive vs inductive reasoning: Make smarter arguments, better decisions, and stronger conclusions. Retrieved October 30, 2018 from https://fs.blog/2018/05/deductive-inductive-reasoning/

Response to Layla’s Response to my 4.1 Post, “The Three Questions”

ET1-MSSL, health and education, ldrs501, Post 4.1, response post
\

Layla’s response can be found here: https://create.twu.ca/layla11/2018/10/26/response-to-sallys-the-three-questions/

Thank you for your generous words in responding to my post, Layla.  The information for strategic leadership is so applicable in many situations!  I believe developing a mindset for strategic thinking is done through daily decision choices when practicing the competencies described by Hughes, Beatty, and Dinwoodie (2014) as scanning, visioning, reframing, making common sense, and systems thinking (p. 72).  We work with core competencies and curricular competencies in our classrooms daily so the understanding of practicing competencies until they are a natural way of doing things is easy to understand.  If we want strong leaders in our organizations and our communities, shouldn’t we begin teaching strategic thinking skills to our students?  Preparing children to be strong members in society is part of our educational mandate in British Columbia (BC, 2018).  As you said, Layla, “leadership stems from our daily life” (Zhang, 2018, para. 1).

There is such a natural fit between children and servant leadership which was a delightful discovery when I took my first courses at TWU.  My premise is to instill transformational servant leadership foundational skills in my students so that the foundation of this approach toward people becomes part of their everyday thinking when they are making their own decisions. Why waste time?  Servant leadership includes such life skills as listening, empathy, stewardship, commitment to the growth of people, and building community (Northouse, 2013, pp. 221-223).  These are the same character traits we want in our classrooms and schools as we train our peer leaders; it seems appropriate to teach them directly to children.  Make the unconscious conscious to facilitate active learning of life-long skills (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 59).

“Train a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not turn from it” (Proverbs 22:6, NIV).

References

BC New Curriculum. (2018). Career education. Retrieved October 29, 2018 from https://curriculum.gov.bc.ca/curriculum/career-education

Hughes, R., Beatty, K., and Dinwoodie, D. (2014). Becoming a strategic leader: Your role in your organization’s enduring success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap: How great leaders and their companies get results.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Zhang, L. (October 26, 2018). Response to Sally’s “the three questions”. Retrieved October 27, 2018 from https://create.twu.ca/layla11/2018/10/26/response-to-sallys-the-three-questions/

Response to Sadie’s Blog Post 4.1: Strategic Leadership and Me!

ET1-MSSL, health and education, ldrs501, Post 4.1, response post
\

Sadie’s original post of Strategic Leadership and Me can be found at https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/2018/10/25/strategic-leadership-and-me/

The Beginning of Wisdom

To acquire knowledge, one must study; but to acquire wisdom, one must observe. - Marilyn vos Savant (Savant, 2018)

Sadie, your in-depth analysis of leadership as it pertains to your personal involvement is rich and specific!  How wonderful to know you are seeking opportunities to make a difference in your educational community in ways that build up your colleagues, find opportunities to serve, and develop your own practice through “building SMART goals and revisiting them often” (Oberle, 2018, para. 10).  I was surprised that the Independent Catholic schools is aligned with contract tenets of the Alberta Teacher’s Association(ATA).  The inherent tension that exists between the Ministry of Education in any province and the Teachers’ Union creates difficulties in practice and in pedagogical stability.  Since your province is undergoing curricular changes at this time as well (Alberta Education, 2018), there must be an increasing angst among elementary teachers who will be required to shift their practice yet again.  Sometimes it is as Solomon laments in Ecclesiastes 1:18, “For with much wisdom comes much sorrow; the more knowledge, the more grief” (NIV, 1983).

Many of us are familiar with the scripture, “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and knowledge of the Holy One is understanding” found in Proverbs 9:10 (NIV, 1983).  In my opinion this fear and reverence instills in us a humility which allows us to be guided and used by God in areas where He needs us the most.  I have often found that small things make a significant impact in someone’s life though you may not discover that importance until years later.  Most of us look for large gestures and changes that are immediately noticeable; Dr. Atha’s reference to the power of the tongue—or more specifically, words—reiterated for me how my daily word choices with my colleagues can build up or tear down, encourage or discourage, build bridges of hope or chasms of despair.  “The tongue can introduce small changes to personal or organizational perspectives that can affect/effect the entire outcome of corporate of personal relations; positively or negatively (Atha, 2018, para. 11).

Real change begins on the inside! To instill in my students the understanding of the power of their words and how much control they have over the events in their every day lives, I tell them:

What you think, you will say;

What you say, you will do;

What you do becomes your behaviour,

And your behaviour shapes your character!

“Think before you speak” OR “Thoughts in the head are better than words that are said”.

(I have said these phrases for years but they may not be my original thoughts; I could not find any quotes to reference.)

As strategic leaders who are hoping to change the practice of many of our followers, we must always consider their mindset as well as our own mindset (Hughes, Beatty, & Dinwoodie, 2014, p. 54).  Strategic thinking takes practice and strategic acting follows the results of our thought processes which often require reframing (Hughes et al., 2014, p. 79).  Do you have an alternative narrative for your organization, Sadie?  Instead of focusing on everything that isn’t changing fast enough, have you created a new vision of “what the organization can and should become” (Hughes et al., 2014, p. 75)?  The Apostle Paul admonishes us to keep our thoughts captive (2 Corinthians 10:5).

Cycles of Change

In your first five years of teaching, Sadie, you will have worked alongside many teachers of varying degrees of experience.  You are a motivator and can also be an innovator!  Your enthusiasm and energy to seek out best practices for yourself can be infectious and empowering to others. “Empowerment should be seen as an outcome, not a behaviour in and of itself…” (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 102).  Are you prepared for others to make huge changes in their practice that may not quite fit your vision for your organization?  Since we are all on a continuous journey of change, we will encounter many evidences of growth that are different from our own.  This, too, will create friction and as strategic leaders we need to continue to help and encourage others even when we are frustrated and make those events a learning experience without making others feel defeated (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 91).

Change is a cycle.  What is new now will be old in another 5-7 years and a new group of graduating teachers will infuse our schools with their enthusiasm and energy, trying to show us all the latest strategies and teaching approaches.  In paragraph 7 of your blog post, Sadie, you address the resistance to change from those long-term staff in your organization (Oberle, 2018).  You made tremendous effort to change some of the culture and “after many failed attempts and a lot of heart and soul poured into the cause” you “felt hopeless” (Oberle, 2018, para. 7).  You also mention that a number of teachers “are confined to the walls of their classroom, leaving other staff members a much heavier workload in the school” (Oberle, 2018, para. 7).  You found some great strategies in assuming value, focusing on positive action, and making the unconscious conscious.

change2 “The amount of significant change in organisations has increased tremendously in the last few years, making it critical to understand the cycle of change” (Virtual Solutions, 2018).

As a teacher who is nearing the three-decade mark, I can attest to the reality for most of the long-term staff who were once where you are now and have performed many extra-curricular tasks which added to the entire school community: coaching, committees, clubs, concerts, courses, communions, meetings, fund-raisers, etc.  They may need to be built up after the onslaught of changes mandated in their careers.  When we look at the need for diversity in our organizations (Galbraith, 2014, pp. 237-241), we must consider the wealth of teaching experience, past life experiences, and expertise perhaps not readily observable in those classrooms.  Being an agent of change is exhausting and longer-serving teachers have been part of many more changes.  Really get to know the people and you may discover that their stories create a more complete picture of your organization.  Can you imagine how many students they have successfully taught to graduation?  Often a thankless task, right?  Are you changing structure, function, or people in your strategic planning?

Here is a link to a little song that I sing in the classroom when my students get impatient with certain other students: Patience https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kn6Z2Mop5I (Agapeland, 2011).  Those of us who have taught awhile might seem to be moving as slow as Herbert the Snail, but we are still moving and sharing the journey.  You may gladly lead us in new directions; don’t let us slow you down or discourage you from your vision or your calling.  Thank you for giving me a fresh perspective on sharing my career with so many different educators, Sadie!

References

Agapeland Music. (2011).  Patience: Herbert the snail.  Retrieved from You Tube October 28, 2018 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kn6Z2Mop5I

Alberta Education. (October 10, 2018). Curriculum Review Timeline. Retrieved October 28, 2018 from https://www.alberta.ca/release.cfm?xID=60779ADBF92D9-BC17-6738-EED797C3813AC9F0

Atha, D. (2018). A systems thinking primer: Seeing organizations in action. Retrieved from Course Notes October 28, 2018 from https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/unit-3-learning-activities/

Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and process at the business unit and enterprise levels (3rd ed.).  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Hughes, R., Beatty, K., and Dinwoodie, D. (2014). Becoming a strategic leader: Your role in your organization’s enduring success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap: How great leaders and their companies get results.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Marilyn vos Savant Quotes. (n.d.). BrainyQuote.com. Retrieved October 28, 2018, from BrainyQuote.com Web site: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/marilyn_vos_savant_121674

Oberle, S. (October 25, 2018). Strategic leadership and me!  Retrieved from https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/2018/10/25/strategic-leadership-and-me/

Virtual Business Solutions. (2018). Understanding the cycle of change. Retrieved October 28, 2018 from http://www.vbsl.co.nz/understanding-the-cycle-of-change/

 

Response to Pierre’s Post: Strategy Renewal and Organizational Design Principles – Pierre’s spin (Post 4.1)

ET1-MSSL, health and education, ldrs501, Post 4.1, response post
\

The original post can be found here: https://create.twu.ca/pierreflorendo/2018/10/23/strategy-renewal-execution-and-organizational-design-principles-pierres-spin-post-4-1/

When is it Time to Walk Away?

“We were desperate to keep our one customer, so our bonds tightened” (Florendo, 2018C, para. 3) speaks to our ability to work hard for a goal or a leader!  I have been in this place a few times in my teaching career and realize my super powers of loyalty and faithfulness can be my undoing. Since I am constantly applying formative assessment strategies to my own practice while instructing others (Arella, 2016), I know this strength is also an evenly balanced weakness when left unchecked.  With your previous descriptions of career experience (Florendo, 2018A and Florendo, 2018B) as part of your developmental learning of sustainable and strategic leadership, Pierre, what measures would you recommend for ensuring you do not find yourself in this position again?  Have you designed a rubric or framework for determining clear vision of when to step away for your own growth and health?

Formative Assessment

(Arella, 2016)

Empowerment Essentials

I appreciate your efforts to invest and empower your employees, Pierre which you delineate in your “Three Positives” (Florendo C, 2018)!  Having worked for a number of administrators with varying leadership styles, I know the value of being supported and encouraged when the pressures of the workplace rise to incapacitating levels. Do you feel it is your responsibility to empower your employees or do you help them to understand how team-building peer support for each other can be without always waiting for the administrator?  Table 6.1 in Ulrich and Smallwood lists a few items to increase empowerment which emphasizes more initiation from team members and less from supervisors” (2013, p. 150).

Growth Mindset

(Lisney & Rankin-McCabe, 2014)

My understanding of empowerment changed somewhat while reading Lepsinger’s description of delegation and informing as core elements of real empowerment.  “Delegation involves giving people the discretion to determine how to do a task without interference” (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 102).  How does an administrator develop the ability to trust employees enough to actually carry out real tasks with the power to make decisions?  Can you develop a Growth Mindset (Lisney & Rankin-McCabe, 2014) regarding employee development while understanding that learning includes failure and mistakes?  Ungerer, Ungerer, and Herholdt (2016) include a change-making tool which contains principles that “can be implemented regardless of the techniques you choose to enable people to implement proposed changes (p. 272).  Is this possible to implement in your facility as you move forward with your strategic leadership changes to reduce the negatives and implement your selected corrective actions?

You are a powerful planner, Pierre, as well as a charismatic, visionary leader!  Your strategic development plan for yourself will accrue huge dividends for your staff as you focus on empowering others and take the time to listen longer and know them more personally.  People will work tirelessly for leaders who invest in them and build relationships of trust.

References

Arella, F. (2016).  Formative assessments: Why, when & top 5 examples. [youtube video] Retrieved October 26, 2018 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RXYTpgvB5I

Florendo, P. (October 2018A). Strategic leadership teams – HC1 (post 3.1) (health care).  Retrieved October 27, 2018 from https://create.twu.ca/pierreflorendo/2018/10/16/strategic-leadership-teams-hc1/

Florendo, P. (2018B). Response to Samson’s response to strategic leadership teams – HC1 post leader. Retrieved October 27, 2018, from https://create.twu.ca/pierreflorendo/2018/10/17/response-to-samsons-response-to-strategic-leadership-teams-hc1-post-leader/

Florendo, P. (October 2018C). Strategy renewal, execution and organizational design principles – Pierre’s spin (post 4.1). Retrieved October 26, 2018 from https://create.twu.ca/pierreflorendo/2018/10/23/strategy-renewal-execution-and-organizational-design-principles-pierres-spin-post-4-1/

Lepsinger, R. (2010). Closing the execution gap: How great leaders and their companies get results.  San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Lisney, C. and Rankin-Mccabe, J. (September 2014).  Growth mindset. [youtube video] Retrieved October 27, 2018 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_oqghnxBmY

Ulrich, D. and Smallwood, N. (2013). Leadership sustainability: Seven disciplines to achieve the changes great leaders know they must make.  New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Ungerer, M., Ungerer, G., and Herholdt, J. (2016). Navigating strategic possibilities: Strategy formulation and execution practices to flourish. [electronic book] Randburg: KR Publishing.

Response to Kamal’s Systems Post

ET1-MSSL, health and education, ldrs501, post 3.1
\

You can find Kamal’s original post here: https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/2018/10/15/organization-and-systems-thinking-week-3-dq-post/

In your discussion of the managerial practices in Fraser Health, Kamal, you referred to the need for communication about performance to be done with consideration for how it will impact the employee.  “While this is necessary, I believe the manager has to be careful how it is communicated to the employee without coming across as minimizing their effort and belittling them.  Communication is one of the barriers at times and which leads to a negative outcome” (Badesha, 2018, para. 1).  Maintaining high standards is necessary for continued growth of any organization though it seems particularly vital in healthcare! Providing feedback in a manner that facilitates the understanding and subsequent changes in practice or behaviour can be a delicate matter even when people know it is part of good practice.  “The starting point of breaking the cycle of low expectations is to assume and listen for the positives” (Lepsinger, 2010, p. 57).  In the pressures of the work environment we can often be so focused on results that we fail to do what we know will increase productivity–build up the people!  The most powerful effect of behaviour modification is the change it will produce on the leader who is practicing the principles to create change in others.  If high expectations deliver higher performances, then leaders should focus on their own need to demonstrate the five leadership competencies mentioned in Lepsinger (2010, p. 59):

  1. Enhance the other person’s feelings of importance and self-worth.
  2.  Encouraging people to step out of their comfort zones.
  3.  Creating a supportive environment that is safe for risk taking.
  4.  Reinforcing positive behaviours and clarifying what ‘good looks like.’
  5.   Providing feedback that is balanced and constructive.

Even when working with recalcitrant children or children who are not progressing academically, our assessment always begins by listing their strengths.  This turns our focus on what they “can do” instead of the deficits.  Students perform better when there is something to work toward instead of a list of things to avoid; adults respond similarly, in my experience.  There are many times when a kind word, a positive interaction, and a brief respite can empower employees to continue striving for increased results.

Atha mentions the power of the tongue, as addressed in James 3:3-6, which “can introduce small changes to personal or organizational perspectives that can affect/effect the entire outcome of corporate or personal relations; positively or negatively” (Atha, 2018, p. 5).  With this kind of power comes great responsibility to use this little but mighty God-given tool for good.  Do you find that your positive interactions empower the people you manage, Kamal?  Can your comments and conversations send more powerful messages that override the less-than-complimentary conversations that some leaders in your organization have with the employees they are trying to bring to a higher standard?  I appreciate your focus on the words we so so often use flippantly, forgetting their long-lasting impact on others.  Organizational systems are so interrelated that when one part is negatively impacted, the other parts are also going to feel the effects (Zeeman, 2017, para. 13).  I Corinthians 12:12-27 speaks to the importance of all parts of the body working together even though each part has its own place and function.  “If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honoured, every part rejoices with it.”  This is how systems should work.

References

Atha, D. (2018).  A systems thinking primer: Seeing organizations in action. [Course Notes]. Retrieved from https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/unit-3-learning-activities/

Lepsinger, R. (2010).  Closing the execution gap: How great leaders and their companies get results. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Zeeman, A. (2017). Senge’s Five Disciplines of Learning Organizations. Retrieved [insert date] from ToolsHero: https://www.toolshero.com/management/five-disciplines-learning-organizations/

Badesha, K. (October 2018). Organization and systems thinking: Week 3 DQ post. Retrieved from https://create.twu.ca/ldrs501/2018/10/15/organization-and-systems-thinking-week-3-dq-post/