"They will be called oaks of righteousness, a planting of the Lord for the display of His splendour"-Isaiah 61:3

Category: Unit 9

Activity 2-Canada Post Analysis

According to Malgeri (2010), “Foresight is defined as the ability to develop and maintain a forward-looking perspective and to anticipate emerging opportunities and problems by continually scanning the environment for trends and new developments” (p. 39).

I would like to briefly analyze how Canada Post has used foresight based on a discussion paper posted on the Government of Canada’s website and answer the questions from Activity 2:

How has Canada Post responded to technological changes?

I think given the rapid changes they have undergone, due to technological advancement speeds, that Canada Post has responded well to some degree. They have thoroughly analyzed where and how they can cut costs. Some of those ways they planned to take action in 2013, was through their “Five-point Action Plan”, which I summarized below:

  1.  Converting to community mailboxes- to make door-to-door mail delivery cheaper. So far, 830 000 addresses have been converted to community mailboxes.
  2. Tiered pricing that raised the cost of a single stamp or was cheaper if purchased in volume.
  3. Opening more franchise postal services, which cost less than corporate post offices. Opened 73 new postal outlets across the country, in convenient locations and offering extended hours.
  4. Streamlining operations: more efficient mail and parcels flow to customers.
  5. Addressing cost of labour through attrition and collective bargaining. (Bertrand et al., 2016, p. 14).

What are some positive and negative consequences of these changes?

Positive consequences of the rapid digital changes in the 21st century are that people can communicate more easily now through their smart phones, email, social media, messaging apps, etc (Bertrand et al., 2016, p. 1). Bertrand et al. (2016) indicated, “Public opinion research focus groups indicate that even though Canadians recognize the ongoing shift to digital communications, they are emotionally attached to mail: personal letters, parcels from loved ones, greeting and holiday related cards are viewed with much affection, even nostalgia” (p. 2). Though Canadians still hold sentimental value to getting mail/parcels and to Canada Post as a service, the negative consequences of digital changes and increased communication are undeniable. Canada Post’s revenue is suffering due to consistent decline in the use of mail.

Canada Post, in seeing their decline in revenues on mail took to making parcels a strategic focus, since the online shopping world was growing, however in this 2016 report Bertrand et al. (2016) stated, “Unfortunately, despite an almost 10 per cent growth in parcel volumes at Canada Post in 2015 over the previous year, the longer term revenue growth in parcels may not be sustainable or enough to offset future declines in letter revenues” (p. 3).

Would you have done anything differently?

I admire Canada post for their active and action-orientated response to saving money and cutting cost, due to the present realities they were facing. However, one thing I observe is that in their first attempt in 2013, with the “Five-point Action Plan”, they were only applying “technical changes”, in order to “keep their head above water” for a short time. However, what Canada Post really needs is to recognize they are in a time where they need to face and tackle “adaptive challenges” (Northouse, 2016, p. 262 & Bertrand et al., 2016, p. 14). Northouse (2016) states,

Adaptive challenges are problems that are not clear-cut or easy to identify. They cannot be solved by the leader’s authority or expertise, or through the normal ways of doing things in the organization. Adaptive challenges require that leaders encourage others to define challenging situations and implement solutions…adaptive challenges are difficult because they usually require changes in people’s priorities, beliefs, roles and values. (p. 262).

The changes they previously applied did not seem to maintain as Malgeri (2010) stated, a “forward-looking perspective” in terms of “anticipating emerging opportunities” (p. 39). They had a forward-looking perspective on the problems, but less of an emphasis on looking for the opportunities (Malgeri, 2010, p. 39).

However, now Canada Post seems to be more forward looking. According to their recent 2016 analysis, they have been looking more at potential opportunities and likely realizing they are encountering “adaptive challenges”, rather than basic cost-cutting, as in their first “5 Point Plan” (Northouse, 2016, pp 261-262 & Bertrand et al., 2016, p. 14). One of those forward looking and opportunistic ideas is interestingly the “Distribution of Marijuana” (Bertrand et al., 2016, pp. 74-75).

Personally, in being “forward thinking”, what I would have done differently was do targeted research on pre-teens and teenagers and their view of Canada Post, mail and parcels. Pre-teens and teenagers have grow up immersed in technology and I think they are less sentimental about mail and parcels. I do not think Canada Post can rely on it’s “sentimentality” to see them through more than 10 more years. Unless they adapt and adapt fast, they will be sadly irrelevant to a generation that I do not think values the use of mail.

There is potential for rapid and drastic adaptation, but in the words of Bertrand et al. (2016):

Canada post is at a crossroads. Canada Post’s costs are growing faster than its revenues. Digitalization is moving its business from letters to parcels…Under the status quo, Canada Post will not be financially self-sustainable going forward. The Corporation’s business model, which reflects the 20th century, needs to be realigned with the rapidly changing technological realities and the changing postal usage of Canadians (p 8). 

 

References

Bertrand, F., Hoeg, K.T., Hopson, J. & Mclaughlin, M, Canada Post in the Digital Age (2016, September). Task Force for the Canada Post Corporation Review. Retrieved from https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/examendepostescanada-canadapostreview/documents/EPC-CPR_rpt-eng.pdf

Malgeri, J. (2010, Winter). Organizational foresight and stewardship. The Public Manager, 39(4), 39-42.

Northouse, P.G. (2018). Leadership: theory and practice (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

RE to Chris: Light from Many Lamps

Thanks Chris for your post about James Gordon Gilkey’s excerpt in Light from Many Lamps. I really related to the beginning when you posed the most commonly used phrases in modern society of “How are you?” and “I’m so busy!”

As of late, I do not like telling people I am busy. I used to say it all the time, but I think it was out of a sense of “self-importance” or a “symbol of status”, as Chris referenced from the author Pinkser (2017).

One thing I have notice in working with students in Christian ministry, was in consistently saying how busy I was, I actually put a barrier between myself and the students. They found me less approachable and had internal thoughts of “I do not want to bother her” and/or “she does not have time to talk to me.” Unfortunately, I think because of coming across as so busy, I may have made students feel like they were “less important” than me. Currently, I try to avoid saying “I’m busy”, so I do not unintentionally make people feel undervalued by subconsciously suggesting “I’m too busy for you.”

Chris, I appreciated your question:

Are there some specific habits you have put in place in your life to combat the tyranny of busyness?

To answer, some habits I place in my life are (although, since starting this part-time MA, while still doing ministry, I have found these harder to apply):

  • Aiming to spend regular time with God in reflection, listening to music, going for nature walks, prayer and reading the Bible. I find this practice of connecting with God daily to help me slow down and gain perspective, especially in the hectic times.
  • Taking time out every week for regular date nights with my husband and protecting those times. Having time to enjoy each other, no matter how busy our lives are, is important to remain healthy in our relationship.
  • Aiming to have a weekly “Sabbath”: Sabbath” is the concept of taking one day a week to truly rest from work and things we find laborious. Instead of work, we rest and/or do things we love and enjoy to be rejuvenated. I believe God designed human beings to need to take at least one day of rest per week, in order to function their best and keep in good health.
  •  I try to keep a certain amount of “flex time” in my schedule and aim not to book my schedule with back-to-back meetings, so that I do not feel “frantic” by the end of the day.
  • I work in campus ministry, so I function on looking at my year in “semesters.” With that in mind, I aim to go on a spiritual retreat centre, once a semester, for about 3-4 days to rest, spend time with God, refocus and at times ask for direction, clarity and guidance.

I recognized through making this list, that in the past and currently when I feel stressed or extra busy, some of the first things to go from this list is that essential time with God or Sabbath rest. These two are such important practices for continually thriving in my relationship with God and in life, especially since they are times where I usually gain the most refreshment and energy.

Monica

 

References

Pinsker, J. (2017, March 1). ‘Ugh, I’m So Busy’: A Status Symbol for Our Time. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/03/busyness-status-symbol/518178/

Watson, L.E. (1951). Light from Many Lamps. New York: Simon and Schuster.

RE to Dawn: Light from Many Lamps

Dawn, than you for your well written post on Frederic Loomis’ reflection. I found this reading and the quote really impactful. Loomis states,

“The best medicine is to stop thinking about yourself, and start thinking about other people” (Watson, 1951, p. 223).

DawnES (2018) stated in summary of Loomis’ reflection,

“In reflection on his deathbed, Dr. Frederick Loomis determined that though we may struggle through life and in death, there is little fruit that comes from being obsessed with our own woes [Blog post]. Rather, it is to our benefit and development  to “stop thinking about [our]selves, and start thinking about other people. [We] can lighten our load by doing something for someone else” (Watson, 1951, p. 224 as quoted by DawnES, 2018 [Blog post] ).

Personally, I have seen firsthand and experience the consequences of how the prevalent cultural mantra of “you do you”, “whatever makes you happy” or “find yourself” can build people into thinking they are the “centres of the universe” and that “the world revolves around them.” When this belief gets taken to extremes and/or faces pressure of difficult circumstances, what oozes out is the belief that “others needs are not important” and people’s dignity and self-worth are affected negatively. When a leader behaves in this way, the cost is great on both them and those who they lead.

Loomis’ antidote is “to stop thinking about yourself, and start thinking about other people” (Watson, 1941, p. 223). Though I believe this is the beginning of change, the process is more complex and difficult. Additionally, it is a road that many people do not walk, even though they know it is the right thing to do.

I appreciate the question DawnES (2018) posed and would like to answer it by sharing what I think is most important; her question was:

“As a servant leader, what does this mean for me to focus on others with authentic love to facilitate forgiveness and healing in their lives” [Blog post]?

What comes to mind when DawnES (2018), mentioned “authentic love” is the phrase, “love God, love others”[Blog post]. This is a famous Christian paraphrase from Jesus’ great commandment. The greatest commandment is found in Mark 12:30-31 (New International Version) where Jesus states,

” “Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.” The second is this: “Love your neighbour as yourself, there is no commandment greater than these.”  “

Another way Jesus stated this commandment was in John 13:34-35 (English Standard Version):

“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another.”

Personally, I think the truths in these statements from the Bible is the only complete antidote “To stop thinking about yourself, and start thinking about other people” (Watson, 1941, p. 224).  Loomis states bluntly, “snap out of it” and though this is the essential beginning of someone realizing something needs to change,  I think that the actual changing of a person to authentically and purely think of “others before themselves” is only when they have a greater perspective on the situation and only when the power for that change comes from an “outside source” (Watson, 1941, p. 224). I say this, not only because I have belief in the Christian faith, but because in pure reasoning; from both observation of the world and from personal experience, I see a broken world and the brokenness of my own soul. I know I am a flawed and limited human being. In me there is only so much love to give and the ability to love unconditionally is very difficult and additionally based upon history, family upbringing and my own ability to accept love that is in my life.

In regards to true authentic love, I have only experienced that kind of love when I have known an “outside source”, that is already perfect love, imparted to me. I cannot create that love in myself, just as I cannot create something that I do not have. I think all of us know deep down, that we do not have or give the kind of love that we wish we could, we know our own brokenness and our twisted motives. When we start “to snap out of it”, that is the beginning of either continuing to try and dig this love up in our lives for others, potentially at the detriment to our own well-being, or realize that there is a perfect love beyond us that we can know through relationship with Jesus (Watson, 1941, p. 224). Jesus contains and states a love that is capable of loving others in a healthy way; first, receiving and having God’s love through relationship with Jesus; second, through this love learning to love yourself with the right perspective; third, then “loving your neighbour as yourself.” Interestingly Jesus does not say in Mark 12:30-31 (New International version), “love you neighbour above yourself”, he says, love them “as yourself”, this is a healthy love, to think of others with having a healthy and whole view of how you are loved, your limitations, but also your infinite value to God and how your relationship with Him allows that love to outpour onto others.  Jesus’ love for others is pure, true and good; it is others centred, without deprecating one’s own dignity and has no limitations. The danger with applying Loomis’ antidote, without the right perspective or the right source of love is a self-deprecating love, which leaves you without dignity or value, and as a result leaves you feeling burnt out and used. This is not healthy love or “authentic love”.
I think with this healthy kind of love, that still puts others first, we can truly bring healing and forgiveness to those we lead.

Monica

 

References

DawnES. (2018, November 17). Unit 8-Light from many lamps. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://create.twu.ca/leadinnovation/2018/11/17/unit-8-light-from-many-lamps/

Watson, L.E. (1951). Light from Many Lamps. New York: Simon and Schuster.

© 2026 Monica Grace

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑